Suppr超能文献

情感触摸对背叛厌恶、利他主义和冒险行为的(零)影响

The (Null) Effect of Affective Touch on Betrayal Aversion, Altruism, and Risk Taking.

作者信息

Koppel Lina, Andersson David, Morrison India, Västfjäll Daniel, Tinghög Gustav

机构信息

Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

JEDI Lab, Division of Economics, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:251. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00251. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Pleasant touch is thought to increase the release of oxytocin. Oxytocin, in turn, has been extensively studied with regards to its effects on trust and prosocial behavior, but results remain inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of touch on economic decision making. Participants ( = 120) were stroked on their left arm using a soft brush (touch condition) or not at all (control condition; varied within subjects), while they performed a series of decision tasks assessing betrayal aversion (the Betrayal Aversion Elicitation Task), altruism (donating money to a charitable organization), and risk taking (the Balloon Analog Risk Task). We found no significant effect of touch on any of the outcome measures, neither within nor between subjects. Furthermore, effects were not moderated by gender or attachment. However, attachment avoidance had a significant effect on altruism in that those who were high in avoidance donated less money. Our findings contribute to the understanding of affective touch-and, by extension, oxytocin-in social behavior, and decision making by showing that touch does not directly influence performance in tasks involving risk and prosocial decisions. Specifically, our work casts further doubt on the validity of oxytocin research in humans.

摘要

愉悦的触摸被认为会增加催产素的释放。反过来,催产素对信任和亲社会行为的影响已得到广泛研究,但结果仍不一致。本研究的目的是调查触摸对经济决策的影响。参与者(n = 120)在执行一系列评估背叛厌恶(背叛厌恶诱发任务)、利他主义(向慈善组织捐款)和冒险(气球模拟风险任务)的决策任务时,使用软刷轻抚其左臂(触摸条件)或根本不进行触摸(对照条件;受试者内变化)。我们发现触摸对任何结果指标均无显著影响,无论是在受试者内还是受试者间。此外,效应不受性别或依恋的调节。然而,回避依恋对利他主义有显著影响,即回避程度高的人捐款较少。我们的研究结果有助于理解情感触摸——进而理解催产素——在社会行为和决策中的作用,表明触摸不会直接影响涉及风险和亲社会决策的任务表现。具体而言,我们的工作进一步质疑了人类催产素研究的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aa1/5742217/cfdced730d5c/fnbeh-11-00251-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验