Västfjäll Daniel, Slovic Paul, Burns William J, Erlandsson Arvid, Koppel Lina, Asutay Erkin, Tinghög Gustav
Linköping UniversityLinköping, Sweden; Decision ResearchEugene, OR, USA.
Decision Research Eugene, OR, USA.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00325. eCollection 2016.
Research has demonstrated that two types of affect have an influence on judgment and decision making: incidental affect (affect unrelated to a judgment or decision such as a mood) and integral affect (affect that is part of the perceiver's internal representation of the option or target under consideration). So far, these two lines of research have seldom crossed so that knowledge concerning their combined effects is largely missing. To fill this gap, the present review highlights differences and similarities between integral and incidental affect. Further, common and unique mechanisms that enable these two types of affect to influence judgment and choices are identified. Finally, some basic principles for affect integration when the two sources co-occur are outlined. These mechanisms are discussed in relation to existing work that has focused on incidental or integral affect but not both.
研究表明，有两种情感会对判断和决策产生影响：附带情感（与判断或决策无关的情感，如情绪）和整体情感（作为感知者对正在考虑的选项或目标的内部表征一部分的情感）。到目前为止，这两条研究路线很少交叉，因此关于它们综合影响的知识基本缺失。为了填补这一空白，本综述突出了整体情感和附带情感之间的异同。此外，还确定了使这两种情感能够影响判断和选择的共同机制和独特机制。最后，概述了两种情感来源同时出现时情感整合的一些基本原则。这些机制将结合现有专注于附带情感或整体情感而非两者兼顾的研究工作进行讨论。
