van de Ruit Mark, Grey Michael J
Neuromuscular Control Laboratory, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Alliance, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 12;11:601. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00601. eCollection 2017.
Both motor imagery and mirror training have been used in motor rehabilitation settings to promote skill learning and plasticity. As motor imagery and mirror training are suggested to be closely linked, it was hypothesized that mirror training augmented by motor imagery would increase corticospinal excitability (CSE) significantly compared to mirror training alone. Forty-four participants were split over two experimental groups. Each participant visited the laboratory once to receive either mirror training alone or mirror training augmented with layered stimulus response training (LSRT), a type of motor imagery training. Participants performed 16 min of mirror training, making repetitive grasping movements paced by a metronome. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping was performed before and after the mirror training to test for changes in CSE of the untrained hand. Self-reports suggested that the imagery training was effective in helping the participant to perform the mirror training task as instructed. Nonetheless, neither training type resulted in a significant change of TMS map area, nor was there an interaction between the groups. The results from the study revealed no effect of a single session of 16 min of either mirror training or mirror training enhanced by imagery on TMS map area. Despite the negative result of the present experiment, this does not suggest that either motor imagery or mirror training might be ineffective as a rehabilitation therapy. Further study is required to allow disentangling the role of imagery and action observation in mirror training so that mirror training can be further tailored to the individual according to their abilities.
运动想象和镜像训练都已应用于运动康复环境中,以促进技能学习和可塑性。由于运动想象和镜像训练被认为紧密相关,因此研究假设,与单纯的镜像训练相比,结合运动想象的镜像训练会显著提高皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)。44名参与者被分为两个实验组。每位参与者都到实验室接受一次训练,要么是单纯的镜像训练,要么是结合分层刺激反应训练(LSRT,一种运动想象训练)的镜像训练。参与者进行16分钟的镜像训练,跟随节拍器进行重复抓握动作。在镜像训练前后进行经颅磁刺激(TMS)映射,以测试未训练手的CSE变化。自我报告表明,想象训练有效地帮助参与者按要求完成镜像训练任务。尽管如此,两种训练类型均未导致TMS映射区域发生显著变化,两组之间也没有交互作用。研究结果显示,16分钟的单纯镜像训练或结合想象的镜像训练,均对TMS映射区域没有影响。尽管本实验结果为阴性,但这并不意味着运动想象或镜像训练作为一种康复疗法无效。需要进一步研究以厘清想象和动作观察在镜像训练中的作用,从而能够根据个体能力进一步调整镜像训练。