Ruddy Kathy L, Rudolf Anne K, Kalkman Barbara, King Maedbh, Daffertshofer Andreas, Carroll Timothy J, Carson Richard G
Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College DublinDublin, Ireland; School of Psychology, Queen's University BelfastNorthern Ireland, UK; Neural Control of Movement Lab, ETH ZurichZurich, Switzerland.
Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College DublinDublin, Ireland; Department of Neurocognitive Psychology, Goethe UniversityFrankfurt, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 3;10:204. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00204. eCollection 2016.
Cross education is the process whereby training of one limb gives rise to increases in the subsequent performance of its opposite counterpart. The execution of many unilateral tasks is associated with increased excitability of corticospinal projections from primary motor cortex (M1) to the opposite limb. It has been proposed that these effects are causally related. Our aim was to establish whether changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) arising from prior training of the opposite limb determine levels of interlimb transfer. We used three vision conditions shown previously to modulate the excitability of corticospinal projections to the inactive (right) limb during wrist flexion movements performed by the training (left) limb. These were: (1) mirrored visual feedback of the training limb; (2) no visual feedback of either limb; and (3) visual feedback of the inactive limb. Training comprised 300 discrete, ballistic wrist flexion movements executed as rapidly as possible. Performance of the right limb on the same task was assessed prior to, at the mid point of, and following left limb training. There was no evidence that variations in the excitability of corticospinal projections (assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)) to the inactive limb were associated with, or predictive of, the extent of interlimb transfer that was expressed. There were however associations between alterations in muscle activation dynamics observed for the untrained limb, and the degree of positive transfer that arose from training of the opposite limb. The results suggest that the acute adaptations that mediate the bilateral performance gains realized through unilateral practice of this ballistic wrist flexion task are mediated by neural elements other than those within M1 that are recruited at rest by single-pulse TMS.
交叉训练效应是指对一侧肢体进行训练会导致其对侧肢体随后的表现有所提高的过程。许多单侧任务的执行与从初级运动皮层(M1)到对侧肢体的皮质脊髓投射兴奋性增加有关。有人提出这些效应存在因果关系。我们的目的是确定由对侧肢体先前训练引起的皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)变化是否决定肢体间转移的程度。我们使用了之前展示过的三种视觉条件,以在训练(左侧)肢体进行腕关节屈曲运动时调节皮质脊髓向非活动(右侧)肢体投射的兴奋性。这些条件分别是:(1)训练肢体的镜像视觉反馈;(2)两侧肢体均无视觉反馈;(3)非活动肢体的视觉反馈。训练包括300次离散的、快速进行的弹道式腕关节屈曲运动。在左侧肢体训练前、训练中点以及训练后,评估右侧肢体在相同任务上的表现。没有证据表明对非活动肢体的皮质脊髓投射兴奋性变化(通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估)与所表现出的肢体间转移程度相关或可预测该程度。然而,未训练肢体观察到的肌肉激活动态变化与对侧肢体训练产生的正向转移程度之间存在关联。结果表明,通过这种弹道式腕关节屈曲任务的单侧练习实现双侧表现提升的急性适应性变化是由单脉冲TMS在静息状态下募集的M1以外的神经元件介导的。