• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔引流术:手术教学安全吗?

Burr hole trepanation for chronic subdural hematomas: is surgical education safe?

作者信息

Maldaner Nicolai, Sosnova Marketa, Sarnthein Johannes, Bozinov Oliver, Regli Luca, Stienen Martin N

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich & Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 May;160(5):901-911. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3458-8. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-017-3458-8
PMID:29313100
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data concerning the safety and efficacy of surgical education for neurosurgical residents in the evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) by burr hole trepanation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients receiving burr hole trepanation for uni- or bilateral cSDH. Patients operated by a supervised neurosurgery resident (teaching cases) were compared to patients operated by a board-certified faculty neurosurgeon (BCFN; non-teaching cases). The primary endpoint was surgical revision for any reason until the last follow-up. The secondary endpoint was occurrence of any complication until the last follow-up. Clinical status, type of complications, mortality, length of surgery (LOS), and hospitalization (LOH) were tertiary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of n = 253 cases were analyzed, of which n = 217 (85.8%) were teaching and n = 36 (14.2%) non-teaching cases. The study groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, surgical risk (ASA score), and preoperative status (Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)). The cohort was followed for a mean of 242 days (standard deviation 302). In multivariate analysis, teaching cases were as likely as non-teaching cases to require revision surgery (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.59; p = 0.348) as well as to experience any complication until the last follow-up (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37-1.67; p = 0.532). Mean LOS was about 10 min longer in teaching cases (53.0 ± 26.1 min vs. 43.5 ± 17.8 min; p = 0.036), but LOH was similar. There were no group differences in clinical status, mortality and type of complication at discharge, and the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Burr hole trepanation for cSDH can be safely performed by supervised neurosurgical residents enrolled in a structured training program, without increasing the risk for revision surgery, perioperative complications, or worse outcome.

摘要

背景

关于神经外科住院医师在慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)钻孔引流手术教育方面的安全性和有效性的数据匮乏。

方法

这是一项对前瞻性收集的连续接受单侧或双侧cSDH钻孔引流手术患者数据的回顾性分析。将由接受监督的神经外科住院医师进行手术的患者(教学病例)与由获得委员会认证的神经外科教员(BCFN;非教学病例)进行手术的患者进行比较。主要终点是直至最后一次随访时因任何原因进行的手术翻修。次要终点是直至最后一次随访时发生的任何并发症。临床状况、并发症类型、死亡率、手术时长(LOS)和住院时长(LOH)是三级终点。

结果

共分析了n = 253例病例,其中n = 217例(85.8%)为教学病例,n = 36例(14.2%)为非教学病例。研究组在年龄、性别、手术风险(ASA评分)和术前状况(卡诺夫斯基功能状态量表(KPS)、改良Rankin量表(mRS)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS))方面均衡。该队列平均随访242天(标准差302)。在多变量分析中,教学病例与非教学病例一样,直至最后一次随访时需要进行翻修手术的可能性(OR 0.65,95% CI 0.27 - 1.59;p = 0.348)以及发生任何并发症的可能性(OR 0.79,95% CI 0.37 - 1.67;p = 0.532)相同。教学病例的平均LOS长约10分钟(53.0 ± 26.1分钟对43.5 ± 17.8分钟;p = 0.036),但LOH相似。出院时以及最后一次随访时,两组在临床状况、死亡率和并发症类型方面无差异。

结论

对于cSDH的钻孔引流手术,参加结构化培训项目且接受监督的神经外科住院医师可以安全地进行,而不会增加手术翻修、围手术期并发症或更差预后的风险。

相似文献

1
Burr hole trepanation for chronic subdural hematomas: is surgical education safe?慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔引流术:手术教学安全吗?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 May;160(5):901-911. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3458-8. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Patterns of care: burr-hole cover application for chronic subdural hematoma trepanation.治疗模式:慢性硬脑膜下血肿钻孔引流术后的颅骨孔覆盖应用。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E14. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19245.
3
Improving the aesthetic outcome with burr hole cover placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation-a retrospective pilot study.颅骨钻孔覆盖物放置在慢性硬膜下血肿清除术中改善美观效果的回顾性初步研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Nov;160(11):2129-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3659-9. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
COveRs to impRove AesthetiC ouTcome after Surgery for Chronic subdural haemAtoma by buRr hole trepanation (CORRECT-SCAR): protocol of a Swiss single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.颅骨钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿后改善美观结局的覆盖物(CORRECT-SCAR):瑞士单盲、随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 6;9(12):e031375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031375.
5
Risk factors for reoperation after initial burr hole trephination in chronic subdural hematomas.慢性硬膜下血肿初次钻孔引流术后再次手术的危险因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;138:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
6
Predicting Functional Impairment in patients with chronic subdural hematoma treated with burr hole Trepanation-The FIT-score.预测采用钻孔引流术治疗的慢性硬膜下血肿患者的功能损害——FIT评分
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
Outcomes of Subdural Versus Subperiosteal Drain After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.颅骨钻孔术后慢性硬脑膜下血肿引流中外膜下与硬脑膜下置管引流的结果:一项多中心队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e392-e401. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.168. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
8
Chronic subdural hematoma--craniotomy versus burr hole trepanation.慢性硬膜下血肿——开颅手术与钻孔引流术
Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Dec;23(6):612-6. doi: 10.3109/02688690903370297.
9
Treatment of chronic subdural hematomas with subdural evacuating port system placement in the intensive care unit: evolution of practice and comparison with bur hole evacuation in the operating room.在重症监护病房中使用硬膜下引流端口系统治疗慢性硬膜下血肿:实践的演变及与手术室钻孔引流的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1443-1448. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161166. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Outcome of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Treated with Single Burr Hole Under Local Anesthesia.局部麻醉下单钻孔治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020 Jan;30(1):101-106. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i1.13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of surgical techniques in the management of chronic subdural hematomas and risk factors for poor outcomes.慢性硬脑膜下血肿手术治疗方法的比较分析及预后不良的危险因素。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jun 3;47(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02493-y.
2
Transformation of neurosurgical training from "see one, do one, teach one" to AR/VR & simulation - A survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons.神经外科培训从“看一例,做一例,教一例”向虚拟现实/增强现实及模拟技术的转变——欧洲神经外科协会青年神经外科医生的一项调查
Brain Spine. 2022 Aug 15;2:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100929. eCollection 2022.
3
Neurosurgery outcomes and complications in a monocentric 7-year patient registry.
单中心7年患者登记中的神经外科手术结果与并发症
Brain Spine. 2022 Jan 19;2:100860. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100860. eCollection 2022.
4
Procedures performed during neurosurgery residency in Europe.神经外科住院医师培训期间的手术操作。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Oct;162(10):2303-2311. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04513-4. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
5
COveRs to impRove AesthetiC ouTcome after Surgery for Chronic subdural haemAtoma by buRr hole trepanation (CORRECT-SCAR): protocol of a Swiss single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.颅骨钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿后改善美观结局的覆盖物(CORRECT-SCAR):瑞士单盲、随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 6;9(12):e031375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031375.
6
Smoking status and perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing cranial tumor surgery.吸烟状况与颅肿瘤手术患者围手术期不良事件。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Aug;144(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03206-y. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Safety of resident training in the microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors: Data from a prospective registry of complications and outcome.颅内肿瘤显微切除术中住院医师培训的安全性:并发症和结局前瞻性登记数据。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37533-3.
8
Improving the aesthetic outcome with burr hole cover placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation-a retrospective pilot study.颅骨钻孔覆盖物放置在慢性硬膜下血肿清除术中改善美观效果的回顾性初步研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Nov;160(11):2129-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3659-9. Epub 2018 Aug 28.