Suppr超能文献

人群健康管理干预对控制心血管疾病差异的影响。

Impact of a Population Health Management Intervention on Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Control.

机构信息

Harvard/Massachusetts General Hospital Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Program, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):463-470. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4227-3. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare systems use population health management programs to improve the quality of cardiovascular disease care. Adding a dedicated population health coordinator (PHC) who identifies and reaches out to patients not meeting cardiovascular care goals to these programs may help reduce disparities in cardiovascular care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a program that used PHCs decreased racial/ethnic disparities in LDL cholesterol and blood pressure (BP) control.

DESIGN

Retrospective difference-in-difference analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve thousdand five hundred fifty-five primary care patients with cardiovascular disease (cohort for LDL analysis) and 41,183 with hypertension (cohort for BP analysis).

INTERVENTION

From July 1, 2014-December 31, 2014, 18 practices used an information technology (IT) system to identify patients not meeting LDL and BP goals; 8 practices also received a PHC. We examined whether having the PHC plus IT system, compared with having the IT system alone, decreased racial/ethnic disparities, using difference-in-difference analysis of data collected before and after program implementation.

MAIN MEASURES

Meeting guideline concordant LDL and BP goals.

KEY RESULTS

At baseline, there were racial/ethnic disparities in meeting LDL (p = 0.007) and BP (p = 0.0003) goals. Comparing practices with and without a PHC, and accounting for pre-intervention LDL control, non-Hispanic white patients in PHC practices had improved odds of LDL control (OR 1.20 95% CI 1.09-1.32) compared with those in non-PHC practices. Non-Hispanic black (OR 1.15 95% CI 0.80-1.65) and Hispanic (OR 1.29 95% CI 0.66-2.53) patients saw similar, but non-significant, improvements in LDL control. For BP control, non-Hispanic white patients in PHC practices (versus non-PHC) improved (OR 1.13 95% CI 1.05-1.22). Non-Hispanic black patients (OR 1.17 95% CI 0.94-1.45) saw similar, but non-statistically significant, improvements in BP control, but Hispanic (OR 0.90 95% CI 0.59-1.36) patients did not. Interaction testing confirmed that disparities did not decrease (p = 0.73 for LDL and p = 0.69 for BP).

CONCLUSIONS

The population health management intervention did not decrease disparities. Further efforts should explicitly target improving both healthcare equity and quality. Clinical Trials #: NCT02812303 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ).

摘要

背景

医疗保健系统采用人群健康管理计划来提高心血管疾病护理质量。在这些计划中增加专门的人群健康协调员(PHC),以识别和联系不符合心血管护理目标的患者,可能有助于减少心血管护理方面的差异。

目的

确定使用 PHC 的计划是否降低了 LDL 胆固醇和血压(BP)控制方面的种族/民族差异。

设计

回顾性差异差异分析。

参与者

12555 名患有心血管疾病的初级保健患者(LDL 分析队列)和 41183 名患有高血压的患者(BP 分析队列)。

干预措施

从 2014 年 7 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日,18 个实践使用信息技术(IT)系统来识别不符合 LDL 和 BP 目标的患者;8 个实践还配备了 PHC。我们通过比较实施计划前后收集的数据的差异差异分析,检查是否存在 PHC 加 IT 系统,与仅存在 IT 系统相比,是否减少了种族/民族差异。

主要措施

符合指南的 LDL 和 BP 目标。

主要结果

在基线时,在符合 LDL(p=0.007)和 BP(p=0.0003)目标方面存在种族/民族差异。比较有和没有 PHC 的实践,并考虑到干预前的 LDL 控制情况,与非 PHC 实践相比,PHC 实践中的非西班牙裔白人患者的 LDL 控制改善的可能性更高(OR 1.20,95%CI 1.09-1.32)。非西班牙裔黑人(OR 1.15,95%CI 0.80-1.65)和西班牙裔(OR 1.29,95%CI 0.66-2.53)患者的 LDL 控制也有类似但无统计学意义的改善。对于 BP 控制,PHC 实践中的非西班牙裔白人患者(与非 PHC 实践相比)有所改善(OR 1.13,95%CI 1.05-1.22)。非西班牙裔黑人患者(OR 1.17,95%CI 0.94-1.45)的 BP 控制也有类似但无统计学意义的改善,但西班牙裔患者(OR 0.90,95%CI 0.59-1.36)则没有。交互测试证实差异没有减小(p=0.73 用于 LDL,p=0.69 用于 BP)。

结论

人群健康管理干预并未减少差异。应进一步努力明确提高医疗保健公平性和质量。临床试验 #: NCT02812303(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Quality and equity of care in U.S. hospitals.美国医院的医疗质量和公平性。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 11;371(24):2298-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1405003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验