Suppr超能文献

治疗强化程度、就诊失约和规定随访间隔方面的差异与血压控制方面的种族或民族差异之间的关联。

Association of Differences in Treatment Intensification, Missed Visits, and Scheduled Follow-up Interval With Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Control.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.

UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):204-212. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4996.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Black patients with hypertension often have the lowest rates of blood pressure (BP) control in clinical settings. It is unknown to what extent variation in health care processes explains this disparity.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether and to what extent treatment intensification, scheduled follow-up interval, and missed visits are associated with racial and ethnic disparities in BP control.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, nested logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of BP control (defined as a systolic BP [SBP] level <140 mm Hg) by race and ethnicity, and a structural equation model was used to assess the association of treatment intensification, scheduled follow-up interval, and missed visits with racial and ethnic disparities in BP control. The study included 16 114 adults aged 20 years or older with hypertension and elevated BP (defined as an SBP level ≥140 mm Hg) during at least 1 clinic visit between January 1, 2015, and November 15, 2017. A total of 11 safety-net clinics within the San Francisco Health Network participated in the study. Data were analyzed from November 2019 to October 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Blood pressure control was assessed using the patient's most recent BP measurement as of November 15, 2017. Treatment intensification was calculated using the standard-based method, scored on a scale from -1.0 to 1.0, with -1.0 being the least amount of intensification and 1.0 being the most. Scheduled follow-up interval was defined as the mean number of days to the next scheduled visit after an elevated BP measurement. Missed visits measured the number of patients who did not show up for visits during the 4 weeks after an elevated BP measurement.

RESULTS

Among 16 114 adults with hypertension, the mean (SD) age was 58.6 (12.1) years, and 8098 patients (50.3%) were female. A total of 4658 patients (28.9%) were Asian, 3743 (23.2%) were Black, 3694 (22.9%) were Latinx, 2906 (18.0%) were White, and 1113 (6.9%) were of other races or ethnicities (including American Indian or Alaska Native [77 patients (0.4%)], Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander [217 patients (1.3%)], and unknown [819 patients (5.1%)]). Compared with patients from all racial and ethnic groups, Black patients had lower treatment intensification scores (mean [SD], -0.33 [0.26] vs -0.29 [0.25]; β = -0.03, P < .001) and missed more visits (mean [SD], 0.8 [1.5] visits vs 0.4 [1.1] visits; β = 0.35; P < .001). In contrast, Asian patients had higher treatment intensification scores (mean [SD], -0.26 [0.23]; β = 0.02; P < .001) and fewer missed visits (mean [SD], 0.2 [0.7] visits; β = -0.20; P < .001). Black patients were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89; P < .001) and Asian patients were more likely (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25; P < .001) to achieve BP control than patients from all racial or ethnic groups. Treatment intensification and missed visits accounted for 21% and 14%, respectively, of the total difference in BP control among Black patients and 26% and 13% of the difference among Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study's findings suggest that racial and ethnic inequities in treatment intensification may be associated with more than 20% of observed racial or ethnic disparities in BP control, and racial and ethnic differences in visit attendance may also play a role. Ensuring more equitable provision of treatment intensification could be a beneficial health care strategy to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in BP control.

摘要

重要性:在临床环境中,黑人高血压患者的血压(BP)控制率往往最低。尚不清楚医疗保健过程的差异在多大程度上解释了这种差异。

目的:评估治疗强化、预约随访间隔和失约是否与 BP 控制方面的种族和民族差异有关。

设计、环境和参与者:在这项队列研究中,嵌套逻辑回归模型用于估计种族和族裔之间 BP 控制(定义为收缩压[SBP]水平<140 mm Hg)的可能性,并使用结构方程模型评估治疗强化、预约随访间隔和失约与 BP 控制方面的种族和民族差异之间的关联。这项研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 11 月 15 日期间至少有 1 次就诊时血压升高(定义为 SBP 水平≥140 mm Hg)的 16114 名年龄在 20 岁及以上的成年人。旧金山卫生网络内的 11 家社区卫生诊所参与了这项研究。数据分析于 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 10 月进行。

主要结果和措施:使用截至 2017 年 11 月 15 日的患者最近一次血压测量值评估血压控制情况。治疗强化使用基于标准的方法计算,评分范围从-1.0 到 1.0,-1.0 表示强化程度最低,1.0 表示强化程度最高。预约随访间隔定义为从测量血压升高后下一次预约的平均天数。失约是指在血压升高后 4 周内未就诊的患者人数。

结果:在 16114 名高血压成年人中,患者的平均(SD)年龄为 58.6(12.1)岁,8098 名患者(50.3%)为女性。共有 4658 名患者(28.9%)为亚裔,3743 名患者(23.2%)为黑人,3694 名患者(22.9%)为拉丁裔,2906 名患者(18.0%)为白人,1113 名患者(6.9%)为其他种族或民族(包括美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民[77 名患者(0.4%)]、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民[217 名患者(1.3%)]和未知[819 名患者(5.1%)])。与所有种族和民族群体的患者相比,黑人患者的治疗强化评分较低(平均[SD],-0.33[0.26]与-0.29[0.25];β=-0.03,P<.001),失约次数更多(平均[SD],0.8[1.5]次与 0.4[1.1]次;β=0.35;P<.001)。相比之下,亚裔患者的治疗强化评分较高(平均[SD],-0.26[0.23];β=0.02;P<.001),失约次数较少(平均[SD],0.2[0.7]次;β=-0.20;P<.001)。黑人患者的血压控制率较低(比值比[OR],0.82;95%置信区间[CI],0.75-0.89;P<.001),而亚裔患者的血压控制率较高(OR,1.13;95%CI,1.02-1.25;P<.001),高于所有种族或民族群体的患者。治疗强化和失约分别解释了黑人患者血压控制差异的 21%和 14%,以及亚裔患者血压控制差异的 26%和 13%。

结论和相关性:本研究结果表明,治疗强化方面的种族和民族差异可能与观察到的 BP 控制方面的种族或民族差异超过 20%有关,而就诊时的种族和民族差异也可能起作用。确保更公平地提供治疗强化可能是减少 BP 控制方面种族和民族差异的有益医疗保健策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验