Suppr超能文献

通过数字减影血管造影术进行心肌成像以测量左心室质量。

Myocardial imaging by digital subtraction angiography for left ventricular mass measurement.

作者信息

Radtke W

出版信息

Herz. 1985 Aug;10(4):215-9.

PMID:2931339
Abstract

Digital ECG- and respiration gated background subtraction and image combination were used to visualize the myocardial wall in routine left ventricular angiocardiography. Muscle mass was computed from manually traced biplane endo- and epicardial contours according to the multiple slices algorithm. Experimental validation and first clinical applications are reported. In animal experiments (13 pigs, 16 to 25 kg) a close correlation to postmortem measurement was found: r = 0.894 and SEE = 7.4 g for end-diastole, r = 0.938 and SEE = 6.2 g for end-systole. The postmortem measurement was always within the 95%-confidence range of +/- 10%. In 16 patients (five days to 60 years, 3.2 to 81 kg) assessment of myocardial mass by myocardial imaging and conventional angiocardiography was compared. Conventional calculation based on manually outlined cavity contour and mean thickness of a lateral wall segment in the unprocessed angiogram. At end-diastole myocardial imaging and the conventional method correlated closely with r = 0.986 and SEE = 18.7 g. Conventional mass determination was inaccurate in end-systole (r = 0.928, SEE = 56.9 g) with values exceeding the diastolic ones by 26% +/- 19% (mean, SD), sometimes by up to 100%. Enclosure of the papillary muscle in the averaged wall segment probably leads to a mostly overrated mean wall thickness. There was no significant difference between diastolic and systolic results of myocardial imaging. In further investigations myocardial imaging showed good agreement to two-dimensional echocardiographic mass determination and, furthermore, has successfully been applied to study contraction pattern and to evaluate percentage of non-perfused muscle volume.

摘要

在常规左心室血管造影术中,采用数字心电图和呼吸门控背景减法及图像组合来显示心肌壁。根据多层切片算法,从手动描绘的双平面心内膜和心外膜轮廓计算肌肉质量。报告了实验验证和首次临床应用情况。在动物实验中(13头猪,体重16至25千克),发现与尸检测量结果密切相关:舒张末期r = 0.894,标准误(SEE)= 7.4克;收缩末期r = 0.938,标准误(SEE)= 6.2克。尸检测量结果始终在±10%的95%置信范围内。对16例患者(年龄5天至60岁,体重3.2至81千克)进行了心肌成像和传统血管造影术评估心肌质量的比较。传统计算基于未处理血管造影中手动勾勒的腔室轮廓和侧壁节段的平均厚度。在舒张末期,心肌成像与传统方法密切相关,r = 0.986,标准误(SEE)= 18.7克。在收缩末期,传统质量测定不准确(r = 0.928,标准误(SEE)= 56.9克),其值比舒张期值高26%±19%(均值,标准差),有时高达100%。将乳头肌纳入平均壁节段可能导致平均壁厚度大多被高估。心肌成像的舒张期和收缩期结果之间无显著差异。在进一步研究中,心肌成像与二维超声心动图质量测定显示出良好的一致性,此外,已成功应用于研究收缩模式和评估非灌注肌肉体积百分比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验