Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;64(2):198-203. doi: 10.1177/0020764017752020. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
In a highly technical civilization like ours, in which the interest in human communication transcends academic barriers and clinical practice, it seems necessary to look back to Ruesch's work in psychiatry. The main reason of it rests upon the idea that he was one of the few truly outstanding clinicians, researchers, and theoretical in the field of normal and abnormal communication. In fact, he did not only present a wealth of observational and clinical data; more importantly, he used these data to formulate creative hypotheses about the conflict between man and other human beings.
AIM/OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this article is to pay tribute to Dr. Jurgen Ruesch (1909-1995), distinguished psychiatrist, communications experts and psychotherapist. For that reason, here we want to pay tribute to the enormous value of his work for the promotion of mental health and the clinical assessment of normal and pathological communication behavior.
In working out his theoretical stance toward communication, all Ruesch's works here have been reviewed. In line with this, the author also mentions similarities between Ruesch and other psychiatric/psychotherapeutic authors. Also similarities have been established between Ruesch and Frank on "non specific factors in psychotherapy", and tensions within contemporary training of psychiatrists, almost predicted by Ruesch.
While some of Ruesch's ideas about the nature and origins of communication has been discounted, many of his preoccupations are now part of the mainstream, and it is to here that we should look for evidence of his legacy. In fact, he has been the author of rich and fruitful ideas, which are essential to clinical understanding of mental diseases and their treatments. It is not surprising, therefore, that Ruesch's burning interest in the clinical assessment of normal and pathological communicative behavior finds a significant echo in today's proliferation of books, papers, and conferences on communication. For all that, we should honor him.
在我们这样一个高度技术化的文明中,人类交流的兴趣超越了学术和临床实践的界限,因此有必要回顾一下鲁埃施在精神病学方面的工作。这样做的主要原因在于,他是该领域中为数不多的真正杰出的临床医生、研究人员和理论学家之一。事实上,他不仅提供了丰富的观察和临床数据;更重要的是,他利用这些数据提出了关于人类与其他人类之间冲突的创造性假说。
目的/目标:本文的主要目的是向杰出的精神病学家、沟通专家和心理治疗师于尔根·鲁埃施博士(Jurgen Ruesch,1909-1995 年)致敬。为此,我们要向他的工作在促进精神健康和对正常及病态沟通行为的临床评估方面所具有的巨大价值表示敬意。
在制定他的沟通理论立场时,本文回顾了他的所有作品。在此基础上,作者还提到了鲁埃施与其他精神病学/心理治疗作者之间的相似之处。鲁埃施和弗兰克在“心理治疗中的非特定因素”方面的相似之处,以及当代精神病医生培训中的紧张关系,几乎都被鲁埃施所预测。
虽然鲁埃施关于沟通的性质和起源的一些观点已经被否定,但他的许多关注点现在已成为主流的一部分,我们应该在这里寻找他的遗产的证据。事实上,他提出了丰富而富有成果的思想,这些思想对于理解精神疾病及其治疗具有重要的临床意义。因此,鲁埃施对正常和病态沟通行为的临床评估的浓厚兴趣在当今有关沟通的书籍、论文和会议的大量涌现中找到了显著的回应也就不足为奇了。尽管如此,我们还是应该向他表示敬意。