Suppr超能文献

点探测任务测量的是什么?对皮层电活动的反向相关性分析。

What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

作者信息

Thigpen Nina N, Gruss L Forest, Garcia Steven, Herring David R, Keil Andreas

机构信息

Center for the Study of Emotion & Attention, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13058. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13058. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Abstract

The dot-probe task is considered a gold standard for assessing the intrinsic attentive selection of one of two lateralized visual cues, measured by the response time to a subsequent, lateralized response probe. However, this task has recently been associated with poor reliability and conflicting results. To resolve these discrepancies, we tested the underlying assumption of the dot-probe task-that fast probe responses index heightened cue selection-using an electrophysiological measure of selective attention. Specifically, we used a reverse correlation approach in combination with frequency-tagged steady-state visual potentials (ssVEPs). Twenty-one participants completed a modified dot-probe task in which each member of a pair of lateralized face cues, varying in emotional expression (angry-angry, neutral-angry, neutral-neutral), flickered at one of two frequencies (15 or 20 Hz), to evoke ssVEPs. One cue was then replaced by a response probe, and participants indicated the probe orientation (0° or 90°). We analyzed the ssVEP evoked by the cues as a function of response speed to the subsequent probe (i.e., a reverse correlation analysis). Electrophysiological measures of cue processing varied with probe hemifield location: Faster responses to left probes were associated with weak amplification of the preceding left cue, apparent only in a median split analysis. By contrast, faster responses to right probes were systematically and parametrically predicted by diminished visuocortical selection of the preceding right cue. Together, these findings highlight the poor validity of the dot-probe task, in terms of quantifying intrinsic, nondirected attentive selection irrespective of probe/cue location.

摘要

点探测任务被认为是评估两个侧化视觉线索之一的内在注意选择的金标准,通过对随后的侧化反应探针的反应时间来衡量。然而,最近这项任务被认为可靠性较差且结果相互矛盾。为了解决这些差异,我们使用选择性注意的电生理测量方法,测试了点探测任务的潜在假设——快速的探针反应表明线索选择增强。具体来说,我们将反向相关方法与频率标记的稳态视觉诱发电位(ssVEP)相结合。21名参与者完成了一项改良的点探测任务,其中一对侧化面部线索中的每个线索,在情绪表达上有所不同(愤怒-愤怒、中性-愤怒、中性-中性),以两种频率(15或20赫兹)之一闪烁,以诱发ssVEP。然后,其中一个线索被反应探针取代,参与者指出探针的方向(0°或90°)。我们分析了线索诱发的ssVEP作为对后续探针反应速度的函数(即反向相关分析)。线索处理的电生理测量随探针半视野位置而变化:对左侧探针的更快反应与先前左侧线索的微弱放大相关,这仅在中位数分割分析中明显。相比之下,对右侧探针的更快反应通过先前右侧线索的视觉皮层选择减少而系统地和参数化地预测。总之,这些发现突出了点探测任务在量化内在的、非定向的注意选择方面的有效性较差,而不考虑探针/线索位置。

相似文献

8
Impaired neural processing of dynamic faces in left-onset Parkinson's disease.左起病型帕金森病患者对动态面部的神经处理受损。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Feb;82:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验