Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Real World Insights, CESE, QuintilesIMS, Frankfurt, Germany.
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):526-536. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx242.
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast cancer can be used to stratify the population into groups at substantially different levels of risk. Combining PRS and environmental risk factors will improve risk prediction; however, integrating PRS into risk prediction models requires evaluation of their joint association with known environmental risk factors.
Analyses were based on data from 20 studies; datasets analysed ranged from 3453 to 23 104 invasive breast cancer cases and similar numbers of controls, depending on the analysed environmental risk factor. We evaluated joint associations of a 77-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) PRS with reproductive history, alcohol consumption, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), height and body mass index (BMI). We tested the null hypothesis of multiplicative joint associations for PRS and each of the environmental factors, and performed global and tail-based goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression models. The outcomes were breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status.
The strongest evidence for a non-multiplicative joint associations with the 77-SNP PRS was for alcohol consumption (P-interaction = 0.009), adult height (P-interaction = 0.025) and current use of combined MHT (P-interaction = 0.038) in ER-positive disease. Risk associations for these factors by percentiles of PRS did not follow a clear dose-response. In addition, global and tail-based goodness of fit tests showed little evidence for departures from a multiplicative risk model, with alcohol consumption showing the strongest evidence for ER-positive disease (P = 0.013 for global and 0.18 for tail-based tests).
The combined effects of the 77-SNP PRS and environmental risk factors for breast cancer are generally well described by a multiplicative model. Larger studies are required to confirm possible departures from the multiplicative model for individual risk factors, and assess models specific for ER-negative disease.
多基因风险评分(PRS)可用于将人群分层为风险水平明显不同的群体。结合 PRS 和环境风险因素将提高风险预测能力;然而,将 PRS 纳入风险预测模型需要评估其与已知环境风险因素的联合关联。
分析基于来自 20 项研究的数据;根据所分析的环境风险因素,分析数据集的范围从 3453 到 23104 例浸润性乳腺癌病例和类似数量的对照。我们评估了 77 个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)PRS 与生殖史、饮酒、绝经激素治疗(MHT)、身高和体重指数(BMI)的联合关联。我们检验了 PRS 与每个环境因素的乘积联合关联的零假设,并在逻辑回归模型中进行了全局和尾部拟合优度检验。结果是整体乳腺癌和雌激素受体(ER)状态的乳腺癌。
与 77-SNP PRS 联合的最强证据是非乘法关联,在 ER 阳性疾病中,酒精摄入(P 交互=0.009)、成人身高(P 交互=0.025)和当前联合 MHT 的使用(P 交互=0.038)。这些因素的风险关联按 PRS 的百分位数没有遵循明确的剂量反应。此外,全局和尾部拟合优度检验几乎没有证据表明风险模型存在偏离,酒精摄入对 ER 阳性疾病的证据最强(全局 P=0.013,尾部 P=0.18)。
乳腺癌的 77-SNP PRS 和环境风险因素的综合效应通常可以用乘法模型很好地描述。需要更大的研究来确认个别风险因素是否偏离乘法模型,并评估针对 ER 阴性疾病的模型。