Marjoribanks Jane, Farquhar Cindy, Roberts Helen, Lethaby Anne, Lee Jasmine
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003.
Penang Medical College, 33-8-3, Sri York Condominium, Halaman York, Penang, Malaysia, 10450.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 17;1(1):CD004143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004143.pub5.
Hormone therapy (HT) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and dementia in older women. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES: To assess effects of long-term HT (at least 1 year's duration) on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, cancer, gallbladder disease, fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases to September 2016: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We searched the registers of ongoing trials and reference lists provided in previous studies and systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised double-blinded studies of HT versus placebo, taken for at least 1 year by perimenopausal or postmenopausal women. HT included oestrogens, with or without progestogens, via the oral, transdermal, subcutaneous or intranasal route. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the quality of the evidence by using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies involving 43,637 women. We derived nearly 70% of the data from two well-conducted studies (HERS 1998; WHI 1998). Most participants were postmenopausal American women with at least some degree of comorbidity, and mean participant age in most studies was over 60 years. None of the studies focused on perimenopausal women.In relatively healthy postmenopausal women (i.e. generally fit, without overt disease), combined continuous HT increased the risk of a coronary event (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 3 and 7 per 1000), venous thromboembolism (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 4 and 11 per 1000), stroke (after 3 years' use: from 6 per 1000 to between 6 and 12 per 1000), breast cancer (after 5.6 years' use: from 19 per 1000 to between 20 and 30 per 1000), gallbladder disease (after 5.6 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) and death from lung cancer (after 5.6 years' use plus 2.4 years' additional follow-up: from 5 per 1000 to between 6 and 13 per 1000).Oestrogen-only HT increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (after 1 to 2 years' use: from 2 per 1000 to 2 to 10 per 1000; after 7 years' use: from 16 per 1000 to 16 to 28 per 1000), stroke (after 7 years' use: from 24 per 1000 to between 25 and 40 per 1000) and gallbladder disease (after 7 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) but reduced the risk of breast cancer (after 7 years' use: from 25 per 1000 to between 15 and 25 per 1000) and clinical fracture (after 7 years' use: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000) and did not increase the risk of coronary events at any follow-up time.Women over 65 years of age who were relatively healthy and taking continuous combined HT showed an increase in the incidence of dementia (after 4 years' use: from 9 per 1000 to 11 to 30 per 1000). Among women with cardiovascular disease, use of combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (at 1 year's use: from 3 per 1000 to between 3 and 29 per 1000). Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use.Risk of fracture was the only outcome for which strong evidence showed clinical benefit derived from HT (after 5.6 years' use of combined HT: from 111 per 1000 to between 79 and 96 per 1000; after 7.1 years' use of oestrogen-only HT: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000). Researchers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinically meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer.One trial analysed subgroups of 2839 relatively healthy women 50 to 59 years of age who were taking combined continuous HT and 1637 who were taking oestrogen-only HT versus similar-sized placebo groups. The only significantly increased risk reported was for venous thromboembolism in women taking combined continuous HT: Their absolute risk remained low, at less than 1/500. However, other differences in risk cannot be excluded, as this study was not designed to have the power to detect differences between groups of women within 10 years of menopause.For most studies, risk of bias was low in most domains. The overall quality of evidence for the main comparisons was moderate. The main limitation in the quality of evidence was that only about 30% of women were 50 to 59 years old at baseline, which is the age at which women are most likely to consider HT for vasomotor symptoms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT, provided they do not have specific contraindications. HT may be unsuitable for some women, including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, increased risk of thromboembolic disease (such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis) or increased risk of some types of cancer (such as breast cancer, in women with a uterus). The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented.HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia, nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women. Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable. Data are insufficient for assessment of the risk of long-term HT use in perimenopausal women and in postmenopausal women younger than 50 years of age.
激素疗法(HT)被广泛用于控制更年期症状,并已用于老年女性心血管疾病、骨质疏松症和痴呆症的管理与预防。这是Cochrane系统评价的更新版本,该评价首次发表于2005年。
评估长期激素疗法(至少持续1年)在围绝经期和绝经后女性治疗期间及停药后对死亡率、心血管结局、癌症、胆囊疾病、骨折和认知的影响。
我们检索了以下数据库至2016年9月:Cochrane妇科与生育组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO。我们检索了正在进行的试验注册库以及先前研究和系统评价中提供的参考文献列表。
我们纳入了围绝经期或绝经后女性服用激素疗法与安慰剂对比的随机双盲研究,治疗时间至少为1年。激素疗法包括通过口服、经皮、皮下或鼻内途径使用的雌激素,可加用或不加用孕激素。
两位综述作者独立选择研究、评估偏倚风险并提取数据。我们计算了二分数据的风险比(RRs)和连续数据的平均差(MDs),以及95%置信区间(CIs)。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。
我们纳入了22项研究,涉及女性43,637名。近70%的数据来自两项实施良好的研究(HERS 1998;WHI 1998)。大多数参与者是绝经后美国女性,至少有一定程度的合并症,大多数研究中参与者的平均年龄超过60岁。没有研究关注围绝经期女性。
在相对健康的绝经后女性中(即总体健康,无明显疾病),连续联合激素疗法增加了冠状动脉事件的风险(使用1年后:从每1000人2例增至每1000人3至7例)、静脉血栓栓塞的风险(使用1年后:从每1000人2例增至每1000人4至11例)、中风的风险(使用3年后:从每1000人6例增至每1000人6至12例)、乳腺癌的风险(使用5.6年后:从每1000人19例增至每1000人20至30例)、胆囊疾病的风险(使用5.6年后:从每1000人27例增至每1000人38至60例)以及肺癌死亡的风险(使用5.6年后加2.4年额外随访:从每1000人5例增至每1000人6至13例)。
仅雌激素激素疗法增加了静脉血栓栓塞的风险(使用1至2年后:从每1000人2例增至每1000人2至10例;使用7年后:从每1000人16例增至每1000人16至28例)、中风的风险(使用7年后:从每1000人24例增至每1000人25至40例)和胆囊疾病的风险(使用7年后:从每1000人27例增至每1000人38至60例),但降低了乳腺癌的风险(使用7年后:从每1000人25例降至每1000人15至25例)和临床骨折的风险(使用7年后:从每1000人141例降至每1000人92至113例),且在任何随访时间均未增加冠状动脉事件的风险。
65岁以上相对健康且服用连续联合激素疗法的女性痴呆发病率增加(使用4年后:从每1000人9例增至每1000人11至30例)。在患有心血管疾病的女性中,使用连续联合激素疗法显著增加了静脉血栓栓塞的风险(使用1年后:从每1000人3例增至每1000人3至29例)。长期使用激素疗法的女性骨折发病率显著降低。
骨折风险是唯一有充分证据表明激素疗法具有临床益处的结局(联合激素疗法使用5.6年后:从每1000人111例降至每1000人79至96例;仅雌激素激素疗法使用7.1年后:从每1000人141例降至每1000人92至113例)。研究人员未发现充分证据表明激素疗法对结直肠癌发病率有临床意义上显著影响。
一项试验分析了2839名年龄在50至59岁、服用连续联合激素疗法的相对健康女性和1637名服用仅雌激素激素疗法的相对健康女性与规模相似的安慰剂组的亚组。报告的唯一显著增加的风险是服用连续联合激素疗法女性的静脉血栓栓塞:其绝对风险仍然较低,低于1/500。然而,不能排除其他风险差异,因为该研究并非设计用于检测绝经后10年内女性组之间的差异。
对于大多数研究,大多数领域的偏倚风险较低。主要比较的证据总体质量为中等。证据质量的主要限制在于,基线时仅约30%的女性年龄在50至59岁之间,而这个年龄段的女性最有可能因血管舒缩症状考虑使用激素疗法。
有无法耐受的更年期症状的女性,若没有特定禁忌证,可能希望权衡症状缓解的益处与短期使用低剂量激素疗法带来的小绝对风险。激素疗法可能不适用于某些女性,包括心血管疾病风险增加、血栓栓塞性疾病风险增加(如肥胖或有静脉血栓形成史者)或某些类型癌症风险增加(如子宫切除术后的乳腺癌)的女性。子宫切除术后仅使用雌激素的女性患子宫内膜癌的风险已有充分记录。
激素疗法不适用于心血管疾病或痴呆的一级或二级预防,也不适用于预防绝经后女性认知功能恶化。尽管激素疗法被认为对预防绝经后骨质疏松症有效,但通常仅推荐给有显著风险且非雌激素疗法不适用的女性。评估围绝经期女性和50岁以下绝经后女性长期使用激素疗法风险的数据不足。