1Department of Nutrition,School of Public Health and Health Sciences,206 Chenoweth Lab,University of Massachusetts,Amherst,MA 01003,USA.
2Partners for a Healthier Community,Springfield,MA,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 May;21(7):1332-1344. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003755. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
To assess the influence of a mobile produce market (MPM) on fruit and vegetable access.
Novel application of a structured assessment (five dimensions of access framework) to examine fruit and vegetable access through self-administered surveys on shopping behaviours, and perceptions and experiences of shopping at the MPM.
Low-income neighbourhoods with limited access to fruits and vegetables.
Older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59·9 years) shoppers.
Participants were more likely to be women and non-White, one-third lived alone and nearly half were older adults. Compared with younger, older participants had different shopping behaviours: tended to purchase food for one person (P < 0·001), be long-term shoppers (P=0·002) and use electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards (P=0·012). Older adults were more likely to like the market location (P=0·03), while younger adults were more likely to want changes in location (P=0·04), more activities (P=0·04), taste sampling (P=0·05) and nutritional counselling (P=0·01). The MPM captured all dimensions of access: availability, indicated by satisfaction with the produce variety for nearly one-third of all participants; accessibility, indicated by participants travelling <1 mile (<1·6 km; 72·2 %) and appreciation of location (72·7 %); affordability, indicated by satisfaction with price (47·6 %); acceptability, indicated by appreciation of produce quality (46·2 %); and accommodation, indicated by satisfaction with safety of location (30·1 %) and high EBT use among older adults (41·8 %).
MPM may influence fruit and vegetable access in low-income urban neighbourhoods by facilitating the five dimensions of access and may especially benefit older adults and individuals living alone.
评估移动农产品市场(MPM)对水果和蔬菜获取的影响。
应用一种新的结构化评估(五个获取维度框架),通过自我管理的购物行为调查以及对 MPM 购物的看法和经验,来评估水果和蔬菜的获取情况。
获取水果和蔬菜机会有限的低收入社区。
年龄较大(≥60 岁)和年龄较小(18-59.9 岁)的购物者。
参与者更可能是女性和非白人,三分之一的人独居,近一半是老年人。与年轻人相比,老年人有不同的购物行为:倾向于为一个人购买食物(P<0.001),是长期购物者(P=0.002),并且使用电子福利转移(EBT)卡(P=0.012)。老年人更有可能喜欢市场的位置(P=0.03),而年轻人更有可能希望改变位置(P=0.04)、增加更多的活动(P=0.04)、品尝样品(P=0.05)和营养咨询(P=0.01)。MPM 捕获了获取的所有维度:可获得性,近三分之一的参与者对农产品的品种感到满意;可及性,参与者的出行距离<1 英里(<1.6 公里;72.2%),对位置的评价较高(72.7%);可负担性,对价格的满意度表示(47.6%);可接受性,对农产品质量的满意度表示(46.2%);可容纳性,对位置安全性的满意度表示(30.1%)和老年人中 EBT 的高使用率(41.8%)。
MPM 可以通过促进获取的五个维度,影响低收入城市社区的水果和蔬菜获取,并且可能特别有益于老年人和独居者。