Hosseini Seyed Mojtaba, Sani Mahsa, Haider Kh Husnanin, Dorvash Mohammadreza, Ziaee Seyyed Mohyeddin, Karimi Aliasghar, Namavar Mohmmad Reza
Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Cell & Molecular Medicine Student Research Group, Medical Faculty, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Stem Cell Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Basic Sciences, SRU, Saudi Arabia.
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Mar 6;668:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
with neural stem cells (NSCs) provides a hope to recover the neural damage and compensate for the lost neural structures for restoration of interrupted neural communications above and below the site of injury. However, cell-based therapy approach suffers from many biological barriers and technical caveats which severely hamper the prognosis. The biochemically-rich microenvironment at the site of spinal cord injury (SCI), the continuing neuro-degenerative process and infiltrating immune cells offer a serious barrier to the donor cells. We hypothesized that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) concomitantly delivered with NSCs would significantly enhance the effectiveness of cell-based therapy for SCI. In a rodent model of SCI (n = 15 animals/group), MSCs labeled with PKH67 (green fluorescence dye) were delivered on day1 after SCI whereas the same animals were treated with NSCs during the subacute phase on day3 (group-5). In comparison with untreated control (group-1), sham group (without cell treatment; group-2), MSCs alone (group-3) and NSCs alone treated animals (group-4), the combined cell treated animals (group-5) showed significantly higher homing of cells at the site of injury during in vivo imaging. Caspase-3 activity was lower in group-5 (P < 0.05 vs all groups) with concomitant reduction in the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 (P < 0.05 vs all groups). All cell therapy groups showed significant improvement in neurological function as compared to group-2, however, it was highest in group-5 (P < 0.05 vs all groups). In conclusion, combined treatment with (NSCs + MSCs) enhances NSCs survival and functional recovery in SCI and is superior to the treatment with either of NSCs or MSCs alone.
神经干细胞(NSCs)为恢复神经损伤和补偿丢失的神经结构以修复损伤部位上下中断的神经通讯提供了希望。然而,基于细胞的治疗方法存在许多生物学障碍和技术难题,严重阻碍了预后。脊髓损伤(SCI)部位富含生物化学物质的微环境、持续的神经退行性过程和浸润的免疫细胞对供体细胞构成了严重障碍。我们假设,与NSCs同时递送的间充质干细胞(MSCs)将显著提高基于细胞的SCI治疗的有效性。在SCI的啮齿动物模型中(每组15只动物),在SCI后第1天递送用PKH67(绿色荧光染料)标记的MSCs,而在第3天的亚急性期对同一组动物用NSCs进行治疗(第5组)。与未治疗的对照组(第1组)、假手术组(无细胞治疗;第2组)、单独使用MSCs的组(第3组)和单独使用NSCs治疗的动物组(第4组)相比,联合细胞治疗的动物组(第5组)在体内成像期间在损伤部位显示出显著更高的细胞归巢。第5组的半胱天冬酶-3活性较低(与所有组相比P<0.05),同时促炎细胞因子IL-1β和IL-6减少(与所有组相比P<0.05)。与第2组相比,所有细胞治疗组的神经功能均有显著改善,然而,第5组最高(与所有组相比P<0.05)。总之,(NSCs+MSCs)联合治疗可提高SCI中NSCs的存活率和功能恢复,优于单独使用NSCs或MSCs的治疗。