Globerman Jason, Mitra Sanjana, Gogolishvili David, Rueda Sergio, Schoffel Laura, Gangbar Kira, Shi Qiyun, Rourke Sean B
Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN), Toronto, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
Open Med (Wars). 2017 Dec 14;12:450-467. doi: 10.1515/med-2017-0064. eCollection 2017.
Behavioral interventions can prevent the transmission of HIV and sexually transmitted infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness and quality of available evidence of HIV prevention interventions for people living with HIV in high-income settings. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CDC Compendium of Effective Interventions. Interventions published between January, 1998 and September, 2015 were included. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Forty-six articles and 63 datasets involving 14,096 individuals met inclusion criteria. Included articles were grouped by intervention type, comparison group and outcome. Few of these had high or moderate quality of evidence and statistically significant effects. One intervention type, group-level health education interventions, were effective in reducing HIV/STI incidence when compared to attention controls. A second intervention type, comprehensive risk counseling and services, was effective in reducing sexual risk behaviors when compared to both active and attention controls. All other intervention types showed no statistically significant effect or had low or very low quality of evidence. Given that the majority of interventions produced low or very low quality of evidence, researchers should commit to rigorous evaluation and high quality reporting of HIV intervention studies.
行为干预可以预防艾滋病毒和性传播感染的传播。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了高收入环境中针对艾滋病毒感染者的艾滋病毒预防干预措施的现有证据的有效性和质量。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和美国疾病控制与预防中心有效干预措施汇编。纳入了1998年1月至2015年9月期间发表的干预措施。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据质量。46篇文章和63个数据集涉及14096名个体,符合纳入标准。纳入的文章按干预类型、对照组和结果进行分组。其中很少有高质量或中等质量的证据以及具有统计学意义的效果。一种干预类型,即团体层面的健康教育干预措施,与注意力对照组相比,在降低艾滋病毒/性传播感染发病率方面是有效的。第二种干预类型,即全面风险咨询和服务,与积极对照组和注意力对照组相比,在减少性风险行为方面是有效的。所有其他干预类型均未显示出统计学意义的效果,或证据质量低或极低。鉴于大多数干预措施产生的证据质量低或极低,研究人员应致力于对艾滋病毒干预研究进行严格评估和高质量报告。