IAME, UMR-1137, INSERM and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité , Paris, France.
Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP, 100 Boulevard Général Leclerc, 92100, Clichy, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;37(3):417-421. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3186-x. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Epidemiological data suggest that ceftriaxone may promote the emergence of commensal AmpC-overproducing Enterobacteriaceae because of a high biliary excretion. We tested this hypothesis in hospitalized patients either treated by ceftriaxone alone or receiving no antibiotics. Hospitalized patients with no previous antibiotics or hospitalization in the last 3 months, treated only with ceftriaxone, were prospectively included. For each ceftriaxone-treated patient, a control patient receiving no antibiotics was included. Clinical data and stools were collected at T0 (before antibiotics) and T1 (at the end of ceftriaxone treatment or at discharge) and T2 (3-6 months after T1) for the ceftriaxone-treated patients and at T0 and T1 for control patients. Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were detected, identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF), and characterized genetically. Clonal relatedness was evaluated by random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR). Fifteen ceftriaxone and 22 control patients were included. Patients' characteristics did not differ. At T0, 2/15 ceftriaxone-treated versus 1/22 control patients carried third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (p = 0.6). At T1, 4/15 (27%) ceftriaxone-treated patients carried AmpC producers versus 0/22 control patients (p = 0.02). Additionally, two and three subjects carried extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the ceftriaxone and control groups, respectively (p = 1). At T2, three ceftriaxone-treated patients still carried AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae with the same RAPD profile as at T1. In hospitalized subjects with no other selective pressure, treatment by ceftriaxone alone promotes the gut colonization by AmpC-overproducing Enterobacteriaceae in over a quarter of patients, with a persistent carriage after the end of antibiotic exposure. The ecological impact of ceftriaxone should not be underestimated.
流行病学数据表明,由于胆汁排泄率高,头孢曲松可能会促进共生的产 AmpC 型肠杆菌科细菌的出现。我们在住院患者中对此假说进行了测试,这些患者要么单独接受头孢曲松治疗,要么未接受任何抗生素治疗。前瞻性纳入了过去 3 个月内未接受过抗生素或住院治疗、仅接受头孢曲松治疗的住院患者。对于每一位接受头孢曲松治疗的患者,均纳入一位未接受抗生素治疗的对照患者。在 T0(使用抗生素前)、T1(头孢曲松治疗结束时或出院时)和 T2(T1 后 3-6 个月)收集头孢曲松治疗患者的临床数据和粪便,在 T0 和 T1 收集对照患者的临床数据和粪便。使用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)检测第三代头孢菌素耐药肠杆菌科细菌,并用基因方法对其进行鉴定。通过随机扩增多态性 DNA-聚合酶链反应(RAPD-PCR)评估克隆相关性。纳入了 15 名接受头孢曲松治疗的患者和 22 名对照患者。患者的特征无差异。在 T0,头孢曲松治疗组中有 2/15 名患者携带第三代头孢菌素耐药肠杆菌科细菌,而对照组中有 1/22 名患者携带(p=0.6)。在 T1,头孢曲松治疗组中有 4/15(27%)名患者携带 AmpC 产酶菌,而对照组中无患者携带(p=0.02)。此外,头孢曲松组和对照组中分别有 2 名和 3 名患者携带产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌科细菌(p=1)。在 T2,3 名头孢曲松治疗患者仍携带产 AmpC 型肠杆菌科细菌,其 RAPD 图谱与 T1 时相同。在没有其他选择性压力的住院患者中,单独使用头孢曲松治疗会使超过四分之一的患者肠道定植 AmpC 过度产生的肠杆菌科细菌,并且在抗生素暴露结束后仍持续携带。头孢曲松的生态影响不应被低估。