Suppr超能文献

头孢曲松和头孢噻肟在住院患者肠道微生物群中出现抗生素耐药性方面无显著差异:一项初步研究。

No significant difference between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiota of hospitalized patients: A pilot study.

机构信息

Équipe Mobile de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France; Institut Micalis, UMR 1319, Université Paris-Saclay INRAe, AgroParisTech, Chatenay-Malabry, France.

Service de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:617-623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime share a similar antibacterial spectrum and similar indications but have different pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ceftriaxone is administered once daily and 40% of its clearance is by biliary elimination, whereas cefotaxime requires three administrations per day and shows less than 10% biliary elimination. The high biliary elimination of ceftriaxone suggests a greater impact of this antibiotic on the gut microbiota than cefotaxime. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime on the gut microbiota.

METHODS

A prospective clinical trial was performed that included 55 patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for at least 3 days. Three fresh stool samples were collected from each patient (days 0, 3, and 7 or at the end of intravenous treatment) to assess the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, toxigenic Clostridioides difficile, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

RESULTS

The emergence of 3GC-resistant gram-negative enteric bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae) (5.9% vs 4.7%, p > 0.99), Enterococcus spp, and non-commensal microorganisms did not differ significantly between the groups. Both antibiotics reduced the counts of total gram-negative enteric bacilli and decreased the cultivable diversity of the microbiota, but the differences between the groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in terms of the emergence of resistance.

摘要

背景

头孢曲松和头孢噻肟具有相似的抗菌谱和相似的适应证,但药代动力学特征不同。头孢曲松每天给药 1 次,其清除率的 40%通过胆汁排泄,而头孢噻肟每天需要给药 3 次,胆汁排泄不足 10%。头孢曲松的高胆汁排泄表明,这种抗生素对肠道微生物群的影响大于头孢噻肟。本研究旨在比较头孢曲松和头孢噻肟对肠道微生物群的影响。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性临床试验,纳入了 55 例至少接受 3 天静脉用头孢曲松(1 g/24 h)或头孢噻肟(1 g/8 h)治疗的患者。从每位患者采集 3 份新鲜粪便样本(第 0、3 和 7 天或静脉治疗结束时),以评估第三代头孢菌素(3GC)耐药肠杆菌科、耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科、铜绿假单胞菌、产毒艰难梭菌和万古霉素耐药肠球菌的出现。

结果

3GC 耐药革兰氏阴性肠道杆菌(肠杆菌科)(5.9% vs 4.7%,p > 0.99)、肠球菌属和非共生微生物在两组间的出现无显著差异。两种抗生素均降低了总革兰氏阴性肠道杆菌的数量,并降低了微生物群的可培养多样性,但组间差异无统计学意义。

结论

头孢曲松和头孢噻肟在耐药性出现方面没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验