Formerly Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California.
Formerly Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MaryLand.
Mol Carcinog. 2018 Mar;57(3):462-466. doi: 10.1002/mc.22770. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Circadian genes have been considered as a possible biological mechanism for the observed relationship between circadian rhythm disruptions and increased risk of hormone-related cancers. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between circadian gene variants and prostate cancer risk and whether reducing bioavailable testosterone modifies the circadian genes-prostate cancer relationship. We conducted a nested case-control study among Caucasian men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess if finasteride (an androgen bioactivation inhibitor) could prevent prostate cancer. We evaluated the associations between 240 circadian gene variations and prostate cancer risk among 1092 biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer cases and 1089 biopsy-negative controls in the study (642 cases and 667 controls from the placebo group; 450 cases and 422 controls from the finasteride group), stratified by treatment group. Among men in the finasteride group, there were suggestive associations between NPAS2 variants and total prostate cancer risk, with one SNP remaining statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (rs746924, odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, P = 9.6 × 10 ). However, we found little evidence of increased prostate cancer risk (overall or by low/high grade) associated with circadian gene variations in men of the placebo group, suggesting potential modification of genetic effects by treatment. We did not find strong evidence that circadian gene variants influenced prostate cancer risk in men who were not on finasteride treatment. There were suggestive associations between NPAS2 variants and prostate cancer risk among men using finasteride, which warrants further investigations.
昼夜节律基因被认为是观察到的昼夜节律紊乱与激素相关癌症风险增加之间关系的一种可能的生物学机制。在目前的研究中,我们研究了昼夜节律基因变异与前列腺癌风险之间的关系,以及降低生物可利用的睾酮是否会改变昼夜节律基因与前列腺癌的关系。我们在前列腺癌预防试验(PCPT)中进行了一项基于白种人的巢式病例对照研究,这是一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验,旨在评估非那雄胺(一种雄激素生物活化抑制剂)是否可以预防前列腺癌。我们评估了 240 种昼夜节律基因变异与研究中 1092 例经活检证实的前列腺癌病例和 1089 例活检阴性对照者(安慰剂组 642 例病例和 667 例对照者;非那雄胺组 450 例病例和 422 例对照者)之间的前列腺癌风险之间的关系,按治疗组分层。在非那雄胺组中,NPAS2 变体与总前列腺癌风险之间存在提示性关联,经过 Bonferroni 校正后,有一个 SNP 仍具有统计学意义(rs746924,比值比 [OR] = 1.5,P = 9.6 × 10)。然而,我们发现昼夜节律基因变异与安慰剂组中男性的前列腺癌风险(总体或低/高级别)增加没有关联,这表明治疗可能会改变遗传效应。我们没有发现强有力的证据表明昼夜节律基因变异会影响未接受非那雄胺治疗的男性的前列腺癌风险。在使用非那雄胺的男性中,NPAS2 变体与前列腺癌风险之间存在提示性关联,这需要进一步研究。