• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用双因素模型评估人格问卷的评价内容。

Assessing the Evaluative Content of Personality Questionnaires Using Bifactor Models.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

b Department of Psychology , Illinois Institute of Technology.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):375-388. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1406362. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2017.1406362
PMID:29319357
Abstract

Exploratory bifactor models with keying factors were applied to item response data for the NEO-FFI-3 and HEXACO-PI-R questionnaires. Loadings on a general factor and positive and negative keying factors correlated with independent estimates of item valence, suggesting that item valence influences responses to these questionnaires. Correlations between personality domain scores and measures of self-esteem, depression, and positive and negative affect were all reduced significantly when the influence of evaluative content represented by the general and keying factors was removed. Findings support the need to model personality inventories in ways that capture reactions to evaluative item content.

摘要

探索性双因素模型与关键因素被应用于 NEO-FFI-3 和 HEXACO-PI-R 问卷的项目反应数据。一般因素和积极与消极关键因素的负荷与项目效价的独立估计相关,这表明项目效价会影响对这些问卷的反应。当去除一般因素和关键因素所代表的评价内容的影响时,人格领域得分与自尊、抑郁、积极和消极情绪的测量之间的相关性显著降低。研究结果支持需要以捕捉对评价项目内容的反应的方式来对人格量表进行建模。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Evaluative Content of Personality Questionnaires Using Bifactor Models.使用双因素模型评估人格问卷的评价内容。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):375-388. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1406362. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: a comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R.考察人格的一般模型在研究精神病态学中的效用:HEXACO-PI-R 和 NEO PI-R 的比较。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Aug;26(4):513-23. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513.
3
The HEXACO Personality Inventory: Validation and Psychometric Properties in the Serbian Language.《HEXACO 人格量表:塞尔维亚语版的验证与心理测量特性》。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jan-Feb;101(1):25-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1370426. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
A Bifactor Model of Personality Organization.人格组织的双因素模型。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):149-160. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1705463. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.多方面构念的一般和特定方差建模:二因素模型与其他方法的比较。
J Pers. 2012 Feb;80(1):219-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.
6
How Well Do Big Five Measures Capture HEXACO Scale Variance?大五人格测量与 HEXACO 量表的差异捕捉能力如何?
J Pers Assess. 2019 Nov-Dec;101(6):567-573. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1448986. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
Using Item Response Theory to Develop a 60-Item Representation of the NEO PI-R Using the International Personality Item Pool: Development of the IPIP-NEO-60.运用项目反应理论,利用国际人格项目池开发 NEO PI-R 的 60 项代表性测验:IPIP-NEO-60 的开发。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jan-Feb;101(1):4-15. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1381968. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
Modeling General, Specific, and Method Variance in Personality Measures: Results for ZKA-PQ and NEO-PI-R.人格测量中的一般、特殊和方法方差建模:ZKA-PQ 和 NEO-PI-R 的结果。
Assessment. 2018 Dec;25(8):959-977. doi: 10.1177/1073191116667547. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.修订版NEO人格量表的国际人格项目池表征测试及基于120个项目的国际人格项目池五因素模型测量方法的开发。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1070-84. doi: 10.1037/pas0000004. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
10
Bandwidth and fidelity on the NEO-Five Factor Inventory: replicability and reliability of Saucier's (1998) item cluster subcomponents.大五人格量表的带宽与信度:索西尔(1998)项目集群子成分的可重复性与可靠性
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):220-34. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268082.

引用本文的文献

1
The Motivation and Opportunity for Socially Desirable Responding Does Not Alter the General Factor of Personality.社会赞许性反应的动机和机会不会改变人格的一般因素。
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1376-1396. doi: 10.1177/1073191119880960. Epub 2019 Oct 16.