Ardakani Emad M, Leboeuf-Yde Charlotte, Walker Bruce F
School of Health Professions, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150 Australia.
Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Jan 9;26:1. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0172-9. eCollection 2018.
Causative factors may be different for the very first onset of symptoms of the 'disease' of low back pain (LBP) than for ensuing episodes that occur after a pain-free period. This differentiation hinges on a life-time absence of low back pain at first onset and short-term absence for further episodes. In this systematic review, we explored whether researchers make these distinctions when investigating the causality of LBP.
A literature search of PUBMED, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases was performed from January 2010 until September 2016 using the search terms 'low back pain' or 'back pain' and 'risk factor' or 'caus*' or 'predict*' or 'onset' or 'first-time' or 'inception' or 'incidence'. Two reviewers extracted information on study design, types of episodes of back pain to distinguish the disease of LBP and recurring episodes, and also to determine the definitions of disease- or pain-free periods.
Thirty-three articles purporting to study causes of LBP were included. Upon scrutiny, 31 of the 33 articles were unclear as to what type of causality they were studying, that of the 'disease' or the episode, or a mere association with LBP. Only 9 studies used a prospective study design. Five studies appeared to investigate the onset of the disease of LBP, however, only one study truly captured the first incidence of LBP, which was the result of sports injury. Six appeared to study episodes but only one clearly related to the concept of episodes. Therefore, among those 11 studies, nine included both first-time LBP and episodes of LBP. Consequently, 22 studies related to the prevalence of LBP, as they probably included a mixture of first-time, recurring and ongoing episodes without distinction.
Recent literature concerning the causality of LBP does not differentiate between the 'disease' of LBP and its recurring episodes mainly due to a lack of a clear definition of absence of LBP at baseline. Therefore, current research is not capable of providing a valid answer on this topic.
腰痛(LBP)“疾病”首次出现症状的致病因素可能与无痛期后随后发作的致病因素不同。这种区分取决于首次发作时终生无腰痛以及后续发作时短期无腰痛。在本系统评价中,我们探讨了研究人员在调查LBP的因果关系时是否进行了这些区分。
2010年1月至2016年9月期间,使用搜索词“腰痛”或“背痛”以及“危险因素”或“因果*”或“预测*”或“发作”或“首次”或“起始”或“发病率”对PUBMED、CINAHL和SCOPUS数据库进行文献检索。两名评审员提取了有关研究设计、背痛发作类型的信息,以区分LBP疾病和复发发作,并确定疾病或无痛期的定义。
纳入了33篇声称研究LBP病因的文章。经仔细审查,33篇文章中有31篇不清楚它们所研究的是哪种因果关系,是“疾病”的因果关系还是发作的因果关系,或者只是与LBP的关联。只有9项研究采用了前瞻性研究设计。5项研究似乎在调查LBP疾病的发作,然而,只有1项研究真正捕捉到了LBP的首次发病情况,其是运动损伤的结果。6项研究似乎在研究发作,但只有1项与发作的概念有明确关联。因此,在这11项研究中,9项研究同时纳入了首次LBP和LBP发作。因此,22项研究与LBP的患病率相关,因为它们可能不加区分地纳入了首次、复发和持续发作的混合情况。
近期有关LBP因果关系的文献并未区分LBP“疾病”及其复发发作,主要原因是缺乏基线时无LBP的明确定义。因此,目前的研究无法就该主题提供有效的答案。