Schnetzke Marc, Fuchs Julia, Vetter Sven Y, Swartman Benedict, Keil Holger, Grützner Paul-Alfred, Franke Jochen
Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at the University of Heidelberg, MINTOS, Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Apr;138(4):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2867-3. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
In operative treatment of distal radius fractures satisfying outcome mainly relies on anatomical fracture reduction and correct implant placement. Examination with two-dimensional fluoroscopy may not provide reliable information about this. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of additional intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the operative treatment of comminuted distal radius fractures.
From August 2001 to June 2015, patients with a distal radius fracture who were treated operatively and received intraoperative three-dimensional scan were included. The findings of the three-dimensional scan were documented by the operative surgeon and analyzed retrospectively with regard to incidence and the need for intraoperative revisions. Clinical evaluation included the patient's medical history, the injury pattern of the affected wrist (according to the OTA/AO fracture classification) and concomitant injuries. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and revision surgeries were evaluated as well.
Of 4515 operatively treated distal radius fractures, 307 (6.8%) received additional intraoperative three-dimensional imaging during surgery. 263 of 307 patients (85.7%) had a distal radius fracture type C. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging revealed findings in 125 patients (40.7%) that were not detected on conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy. In 54 patients (17.6%) these findings led to an immediate revision. Most commonly, revision was done in the case of remaining steps in the articular surface ≥ 1 mm (n = 25, 8.1%) followed by intra-articular screw placement (n = 23, 7.5%).
Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging can provide additional information compared to conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy in the operative treatment of distal radius fractures with the possibility of immediate intraoperative revision.
在桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗中,满意的治疗效果主要依赖于骨折的解剖复位和植入物的正确放置。二维透视检查可能无法提供有关此方面的可靠信息。本研究的目的是确定术中额外的三维成像在粉碎性桡骨远端骨折手术治疗中的有效性。
纳入2001年8月至2015年6月期间接受手术治疗并在术中进行三维扫描的桡骨远端骨折患者。手术医生记录三维扫描结果,并对其发生率和术中翻修需求进行回顾性分析。临床评估包括患者的病史、患腕的损伤模式(根据OTA/AO骨折分类)和合并损伤。还评估了术中及术后并发症和翻修手术情况。
在4515例接受手术治疗的桡骨远端骨折中,307例(6.8%)在手术期间接受了额外的术中三维成像。307例患者中有263例(85.7%)为C型桡骨远端骨折。术中三维成像在125例患者(40.7%)中发现了传统二维透视未检测到的情况。在54例患者(17.6%)中,这些发现导致立即进行翻修。最常见的情况是关节面残留台阶≥1mm时进行翻修(n = 25,8.1%),其次是关节内螺钉置入(n = 23,7.5%)。
与传统二维透视相比,术中三维成像在桡骨远端骨折手术治疗中可提供额外信息,并有可能在术中立即进行翻修。