Bush C, Ditto B, Feuerstein M
Health Psychol. 1985;4(4):307-21. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.4.307.
Sixty-six chronic low back pain sufferers were randomly divided into three groups. Following individual assessments consisting of psychological questionnaires, pain monitoring, and measurement of paraspinal electromyogram (EMG), one group received paraspinal EMG biofeedback and another a placebo treatment. The third group received no intervention. Two further assessments were carried out on all groups immediately after treatment and at a 3-month follow-up. All groups showed significant reduction in pain, anxiety, depression, and paraspinal EMG following treatment and at follow-up, but there were no differences between groups. A regression analysis failed to identify subjects' characteristics that predicted positive outcome in the biofeedback group. However, high scores on the Evaluative scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire and high hypnotizability were significant predictors of positive outcome for the placebo group. It is concluded that paraspinal EMG biofeedback is not a specific treatment for chronic low back pain in a nonhospitalized population.
66名慢性腰痛患者被随机分为三组。在进行了包括心理问卷、疼痛监测和椎旁肌电图(EMG)测量在内的个体评估后,一组接受椎旁肌电图生物反馈治疗,另一组接受安慰剂治疗。第三组不接受任何干预。在治疗后及3个月随访时,对所有组进行了另外两次评估。所有组在治疗后及随访时疼痛、焦虑、抑郁和椎旁肌电图均显著降低,但组间无差异。回归分析未能确定生物反馈组中预测积极结果的受试者特征。然而,麦吉尔疼痛问卷评估量表得分高和高催眠易感性是安慰剂组积极结果的显著预测因素。结论是,椎旁肌电图生物反馈对非住院人群的慢性腰痛不是一种特异性治疗方法。