• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去聚焦的时间沟通克服了保守派对自由政治观点的抵制。

Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas.

机构信息

Social Cognition Center Cologne, Department of Psychology, University of Cologne.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;114(4):599-619. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000121. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000121
PMID:29323508
Abstract

Nine studies and a meta-analysis test the role of past-focused temporal communication in reducing conservatives' disagreement with liberal political ideas. We propose that conservatives are more prone to warm, affectionate, and nostalgic feelings for past society. Therefore, they are more likely to support political ideas-including those expressing liberal values-that can be linked to a desirable past state (past focus), rather than a desirable future state (future focus) of society. Study 1 supports our prediction that political conservatives are more nostalgic for the past than liberals. Building on this association, we demonstrate that communicating liberal ideas with a past focus increases conservatives' support for leniency in criminal justice (Studies 2a and 2b), gun control (Study 3), immigration (Study 4), social diversity (Study 5), and social justice (Study 6). Communicating messages with a past focus reduced political disagreement (compared with a future focus) between liberals and conservatives by between 30 and 100% across studies. Studies 5 and 6 identify the mediating role of state and trait nostalgia, respectively. Study 7 shows that the temporal communication effect only occurs under peripheral (and not central) information processing. Study 8 shows that the effect is asymmetric; a future focus did not increase liberals' support for conservative ideas. A mixed-effects meta-analysis across all studies confirms that appealing to conservatives' nostalgia with a past-focused temporal focus increases support for liberal political messages (Study 9). A large portion of the political disagreement between conservatives and liberals appears to be disagreement over style, and not content of political issues. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

九项研究和一项荟萃分析检验了以过去为导向的时间沟通在减少保守派与自由政治观点分歧方面的作用。我们提出,保守派更容易对过去的社会产生温暖、深情和怀旧的情感。因此,他们更有可能支持那些可以与理想的过去状态(过去焦点)联系起来的政治观点,而不是与社会理想的未来状态(未来焦点)联系起来的政治观点。研究 1 支持了我们的预测,即政治保守派比自由派更怀旧。在此基础上,我们证明,以过去为焦点传达自由思想会增加保守派对刑事司法宽大处理(研究 2a 和 2b)、枪支管制(研究 3)、移民(研究 4)、社会多样性(研究 5)和社会正义(研究 6)的支持。与未来焦点相比,通过过去焦点传达信息减少了自由派和保守派之间的政治分歧(在研究中减少了 30%至 100%)。研究 5 和 6 分别确定了状态和特质怀旧的中介作用。研究 7 表明,时间沟通效应仅在边缘(而非中心)信息处理下发生。研究 8 表明,该效应是不对称的;未来焦点并没有增加自由派对保守派思想的支持。所有研究的混合效应荟萃分析证实,用过去为焦点的时间焦点唤起保守派的怀旧之情会增加对自由政治信息的支持(研究 9)。保守派和自由派之间的大部分政治分歧似乎是风格上的分歧,而不是政治问题的内容。

相似文献

1
Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas.过去聚焦的时间沟通克服了保守派对自由政治观点的抵制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;114(4):599-619. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000121. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
2
Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.关注过去的环境比较促进了保守派的环保成果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14953-14957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610834113. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.运用道德基础理论转变自由主义和保守主义态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1559-73. doi: 10.1177/0146167214551152. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
Stereotype activation and self-regulation by conservatives and liberals in political encounters.政治交锋中保守派和自由派的刻板印象激活与自我调节
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(1):46-60. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1447436. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
5
Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization.政治立场上对自由意志的信念差异与道德判断的差异有关。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Feb;120(2):461-483. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000286. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness.保守派报告,而自由派表现出更高的幸福感。
Science. 2015 Mar 13;347(6227):1243-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1260817.
7
The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.自由派和保守派的道德刻板印象:政治光谱上差异的夸大。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
8
Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people.自由派和保守派在对有影响力的人做出道德判断时,依赖于共同的道德基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;104(6):1040-59. doi: 10.1037/a0032277. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
9
When values and attributions collide: liberals' and conservatives' values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds.当价值观和归因发生冲突时:自由派和保守派的价值观激发了对所谓不当行为的归因。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;36(9):1241-54. doi: 10.1177/0146167210380605. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
10
Conservatives' Moral Foundations Are More Densely Connected Than Liberals' Moral Foundations.保守派的道德基础比自由派的道德基础更紧密地联系在一起。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Feb;47(2):167-184. doi: 10.1177/0146167220916070. Epub 2020 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-adoption pathways toward a low-carbon energy system.通往低碳能源系统的共同采用途径。
iScience. 2023 Sep 1;26(10):107815. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107815. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.