Department of Health Management & Informatics, College of Health & Public Affairs, University of Central Florida-Orlando, FL, United States.
Department of Biology, College of Arts & Sciences, Indiana University-Bloomington, IN, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Apr;54:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.021. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
Our aim was to compare physician-reported barriers to sublingual buprenorphine (BUP) and extended-release naltrexone (XR-NLT) prescribing in U.S. office-based practices, and to identify potential policies for minimizing these barriers. Only one previous qualitative study has examined physician-reported barriers to prescribing XR-NLT and no qualitative study has compared physician-reported barriers between the two medications.
Researchers conducted individual semi-structured and in-depth interviews with 20 licensed physicians in four U.S. states between January 2016 and May 2017. Interview questions included general barriers to addiction treatment in office-based settings, barriers specific to BUP and XR-NLT prescribing, and potential government policies to decrease barriers. Researchers conducted thematic analysis of transcribed interviews. They developed and pilot tested a coding template based on a sample of transcripts, independently coded transcripts in Dedoose software, conducted consensus coding to eliminate coding discrepancies, and then assessed data for themes using research questions as a guide.
General barriers to office-based OUD treatment included limited physician education, limited insurance reimbursement, stigma, and perceptions of "difficult" patients. Barriers specific to BUP prescribing included regulatory restrictions, liability fears, and restrictions imposed by the criminal justice system. Barriers specific to XR-NLT prescribing included limited access to medically-supervised opioid detoxification, lack of awareness of the medication, and patient fears or disinterest. Participants without experience prescribing either medication emphasized barriers to treating OUD in general. Participants with experience prescribing BUP and/or XR-NLT described barriers to treating OUD in general as well as barriers specific to each medication. Policy makers should increase access to addiction medicine education, mandate insurance coverage of both medications and inpatient detoxification, prohibit excessive insurance prior authorization requirements, increase insurance reimbursement for behavioral healthcare, and incentivize interdisciplinary collaboration.
While overlap exists, some barriers to BUP prescribing differ from barriers to XR-NLT prescribing.
我们旨在比较美国门诊实践中医生报告的舌下丁丙诺啡(BUP)和纳曲酮延长释放(XR-NLT)处方的障碍,并确定最小化这些障碍的潜在政策。只有一项以前的定性研究检查了医生报告的 XR-NLT 处方障碍,没有定性研究比较了两种药物的医生报告障碍。
研究人员于 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月期间在美国四个州进行了 20 名持照医生的个体半结构化和深入访谈。访谈问题包括门诊环境中治疗成瘾的一般障碍、BUP 和 XR-NLT 处方的具体障碍,以及减少障碍的潜在政府政策。研究人员对转录访谈进行了主题分析。他们基于样本开发并试点测试了一个编码模板,在 Dedoose 软件中独立编码转录本,进行共识编码以消除编码差异,然后使用研究问题作为指南评估数据的主题。
门诊治疗 OUD 的一般障碍包括医生教育有限、保险报销有限、耻辱感和对“困难”患者的看法。BUP 处方的具体障碍包括监管限制、责任恐惧和刑事司法系统的限制。XR-NLT 处方的具体障碍包括获得医学监督的阿片类药物脱毒的机会有限、对药物的认识有限,以及患者的恐惧或不感兴趣。没有经验开 BUP 和/或 XR-NLT 的参与者强调了一般治疗 OUD 的障碍。有经验开 BUP 和/或 XR-NLT 的参与者描述了一般治疗 OUD 的障碍,以及每种药物的具体障碍。政策制定者应增加成瘾医学教育的机会,强制医疗保险覆盖两种药物和住院脱毒,禁止过度保险预先授权要求,增加行为健康保险报销,并激励跨学科合作。
虽然存在重叠,但 BUP 处方的一些障碍与 XR-NLT 处方的障碍不同。