Sukkarieh-Haraty Ola, Egede Leonard E, Abi Kharma Joelle, Bassil Maya
Alice Ramez Chagoury School of Nursing, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190719. eCollection 2018.
There are widespread fatalistic beliefs in Arab countries, especially among individuals with diabetes. However, there is no tool to assess diabetes fatalism in this population. This study describes the processes used to create an Arabic version of the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (DFS) and examine its psychometric properties.
A descriptive correlational design was used with a convenience sample of Lebanese adults (N = 274) with type 2 diabetes recruited from a major hospital in Beirut, Lebanon and by snowball sampling. The 12- item Diabetes Fatalism Scale- Arabic (12-item DFS-Ar) was back-translated from the original version, pilot tested on 22 adults with type 2 diabetes and then administered to 274 patients to assess the validity and reliability of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the hypothesized factor structure. Cronbach's alpha was used to test for reliability.
CFA supported the existence of the three factor hypothesis of the original DFS scale. The five items measuring "emotional distress" loaded under Factor 1, the four items measuring "spiritual coping" loaded under factor 2 and the last three items measuring "perceived self-efficacy" of the original scale loaded under Factor 3 (p <0.001 for all three subscales). Goodness of fit indices confirmed adequateness of the CFA model (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.067 and pclose = 0.05). The 12-item DFS-Ar showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.86) and significantly predicted HbA1c (β = 0.20, p < 0.01). After adjusting for the demographic characteristics and the number of diabetes comorbid conditions, the 12-item DFS-Ar score was independently associated with HbA1c in a multivariable model (β = 0.16, p < 0.05).
The 12-item DFS-Ar demonstrated good psychometric properties that are comparable to the original scale. It is a valid and reliable measure of diabetes fatalism. Further testing with larger and non-Lebanese Arabic population is needed.
在阿拉伯国家,宿命论观念广泛存在,尤其是在糖尿病患者中。然而,目前尚无工具可用于评估该人群的糖尿病宿命论。本研究描述了创建阿拉伯语版糖尿病宿命论量表(DFS)所采用的过程,并检验其心理测量特性。
采用描述性相关设计,以便利抽样的方式,从黎巴嫩贝鲁特一家主要医院招募了274名2型糖尿病黎巴嫩成年人,并通过滚雪球抽样法进行补充。12项糖尿病宿命论量表阿拉伯语版(12-item DFS-Ar)由原始版本回译而来,先在22名2型糖尿病成年人中进行预测试,然后对274名患者进行施测,以评估该量表的有效性和可靠性。采用验证性因素分析(CFA)来检验假设的因素结构,使用克朗巴哈系数来检验可靠性。
CFA支持原始DFS量表的三因素假设。测量“情绪困扰”的5个项目在因素1下负荷,测量“精神应对”的4个项目在因素2下负荷,原始量表中测量“感知自我效能”的最后3个项目在因素3下负荷(所有三个子量表的p<0.001)。拟合优度指标证实了CFA模型的适宜性(CFI = 0.97,TLI = 0.96,RMSEA = 0.067,pclose = 0.05)。12-item DFS-Ar显示出良好的可靠性(克朗巴哈系数为0.86),并显著预测糖化血红蛋白(β = 0.20,p < 0.01)。在调整人口统计学特征和糖尿病合并症数量后,12-item DFS-Ar得分在多变量模型中与糖化血红蛋白独立相关(β = 0.16,p < 0.05)。
12-item DFS-Ar表现出良好的心理测量特性,与原始量表相当。它是一种有效且可靠的糖尿病宿命论测量工具。需要在更大规模的非黎巴嫩阿拉伯人群中进行进一步测试。