• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".个性化 - 医疗保健中的新兴制度逻辑?评“(再)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?医疗保健中的标准化和定制化作为竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 1;7(1):92-95. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.71.
2
Competing Logics and Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".竞争逻辑与医疗保健评论:“(再)制造普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化作为医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):359-361. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.100.
3
Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".提供者和患者夹在标准化和个体化之间:个体化标准化作为一种解决方案 评“(再)打造普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?医疗保健中的标准化和定制化作为竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):349-352. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95.
4
It Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".二人转:定制化与标准化作为医疗保健中的共谋逻辑 述评:“普罗克汝斯忒斯之床的再打造:标准化与定制化作为医疗保健中的竞争逻辑”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):183-185. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.77.
5
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.(再)铺普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化在医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):301-304. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35.
6
Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".两全其美评论:“(重新)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化和定制化作为医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):356-358. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.99.
7
Toward Customized Care Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".走向定制化医疗服务 评“普罗克汝斯忒斯之床的重塑?医疗保健领域的标准化与定制化:两种竞争逻辑”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):272-274. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.84.
8
Centrality and compatibility of institutional logics when introducing value-based reimbursement.引入基于价值的报销制度时的制度逻辑的中心地位和兼容性。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Sep 15;35(9):298-314. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2021-0010.
9
'What matters to you?' Normative integration of an intervention to promote participation of older patients with multi-morbidity - a qualitative case study.“对你来说什么重要?”促进患有多种疾病的老年患者参与的干预措施的规范整合——一项定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06106-y.
10
Orchestration versus bookkeeping: How stakeholder pressures drive a healthcare purchaser's institutional logics.协调与簿记:利益相关者压力如何推动医疗保健购买者的制度逻辑。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258337. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Researching the Co-Existence and Continuity of Standardization and Customization in Healthcare: A Response to Recent Commentaries.探究医疗保健领域标准化与定制化的共存与延续性:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):572-573. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.07.

本文引用的文献

1
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.(再)铺普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化在医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):301-304. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35.

个性化 - 医疗保健中的新兴制度逻辑?评“(再)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?医疗保健中的标准化和定制化作为竞争逻辑”。

Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".

机构信息

School of Management and Business, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 1;7(1):92-95. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.71.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.71
PMID:29325410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5745875/
Abstract

This commentary on the recent think piece by Mannion and Exworthy reviews their core arguments, highlighting their suggestion that recent forces for personalization have emerged which may counterbalance the strong standardization wave which has been evident in many healthcare settings and systems over the last two decades. These forces for personalization can take very different forms. The commentary explores the authors' suggestion that these themes can be fruitfully examined theoretically through an institutional logics (ILs) literature, which has recently been applied by some scholars to healthcare settings. This commentary outlines key premises of that theoretical tradition. Finally, the commentary makes suggestions for taking this IL influenced research agenda further, along with some issues to be addressed.

摘要

这篇评论是对曼尼恩和埃克斯沃西最近的专题文章的评论,回顾了他们的核心论点,强调了他们的观点,即最近出现的个性化力量可能会抵消过去二十年来许多医疗保健环境和系统中明显存在的强烈标准化浪潮。这些个性化力量可以采取非常不同的形式。该评论探讨了作者的观点,即通过最近一些学者应用于医疗保健环境的制度逻辑(IL)文献,可以从理论上对这些主题进行有益的研究。本评论概述了该理论传统的关键前提。最后,评论就如何进一步推进这一受 IL 影响的研究议程提出了建议,并提出了一些需要解决的问题。