• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两全其美评论:“(重新)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化和定制化作为医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑”。

Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".

机构信息

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):356-358. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.99.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.99
PMID:29626405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5949228/
Abstract

This article builds on Mannion and Exworthy's account of the tensions between standardization and customization within health services to explore why these tensions exist. It highlights the limitations of explanations which root them in an expression of managerialism versus professionalism and suggests that each logic is embedded in a set of ontological, epistemological and moral commitments which are held in tension. At the front line of care delivery, people cannot resolve these tensions but must navigate and negotiate them. The legitimacy of a health system depends on its ability to deliver the 'best of both worlds' to citizens, offering the reassurance of sameness and the dignity of difference.

摘要

本文以曼尼恩和埃克索里的观点为基础,探讨了医疗服务中标准化和定制化之间的紧张关系存在的原因。文章强调了将这些紧张关系归因于管理主义与专业主义表现的解释的局限性,并表明每一种逻辑都根植于一套本体论、认识论和道德承诺,这些承诺相互制约。在医疗服务的第一线,人们无法解决这些紧张关系,而只能驾驭和协商这些关系。医疗体系的合法性取决于其为公民提供“两全其美”服务的能力,既提供一致性的保证,又尊重个体的差异。

相似文献

1
Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".两全其美评论:“(重新)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化和定制化作为医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):356-358. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.99.
2
It Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".二人转:定制化与标准化作为医疗保健中的共谋逻辑 述评:“普罗克汝斯忒斯之床的再打造:标准化与定制化作为医疗保健中的竞争逻辑”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):183-185. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.77.
3
Competing Logics and Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".竞争逻辑与医疗保健评论:“(再)制造普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化作为医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):359-361. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.100.
4
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.(再)铺普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化在医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):301-304. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35.
5
Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".提供者和患者夹在标准化和个体化之间:个体化标准化作为一种解决方案 评“(再)打造普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?医疗保健中的标准化和定制化作为竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):349-352. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95.
6
Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".个性化 - 医疗保健中的新兴制度逻辑?评“(再)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?医疗保健中的标准化和定制化作为竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 1;7(1):92-95. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.71.
7
Toward Customized Care Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".走向定制化医疗服务 评“普罗克汝斯忒斯之床的重塑?医疗保健领域的标准化与定制化:两种竞争逻辑”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):272-274. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.84.
8
Informing health? Negotiating the logics of choice and care in everyday practices of 'healthy living'.告知健康?在“健康生活”的日常实践中协商选择和护理的逻辑。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jun;72(12):2026-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 12.
9
Managing death: navigating divergent logics in end-of-life care.管理死亡:在临终关怀中驾驭不同的逻辑。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Jul;42(6):1277-1295. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13095. Epub 2020 May 6.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation and ethical issues of an eHealth-facilitated integrated care model in stem cell transplantation: A qualitative process evaluation study.干细胞移植中电子健康促进综合护理模式的实施与伦理问题:一项定性过程评估研究
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 29;11:20552076251336859. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336859. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Value configurations for balancing standardization and customization in chronic care: a qualitative study.慢性病照护中标准化与定制化平衡的价值配置:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06844-z.
3
Researching the Co-Existence and Continuity of Standardization and Customization in Healthcare: A Response to Recent Commentaries.探究医疗保健领域标准化与定制化的共存与延续性:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):572-573. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.07.

本文引用的文献

1
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.(再)铺普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化在医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):301-304. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35.