• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于锚定法确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量测量指标的最小重要差异(MID):一项荟萃分析方案

Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol.

作者信息

Musoro Zebedee Jammbe, Hamel Jean-Francois, Ediebah Divine Ewane, Cocks Kim, King Madeleine T, Groenvold Mogens, Sprangers Mirjam A G, Brandberg Yvonne, Velikova Galina, Maringwa John, Flechtner Hans-Henning, Bottomley Andrew, Coens Corneel

机构信息

Quality of life department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Methodology and Biostatistics, University Hospital of Angers UNAM, Angers, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e019117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019117.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019117
PMID:29326191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5781104/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As patient assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer clinical trials has increased over the years, so has the need to attach meaningful interpretations to differences in HRQOL scores between groups and changes within groups. Determining what represents a minimally important difference (MID) in HRQOL scores is useful to clinicians, patients and researchers, and can be used as a benchmark for assessing the success of a healthcare intervention. Our objective is to provide an evidence-based protocol to determine MIDs for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). We will mainly focus on MID estimation for group-level comparisons. Responder thresholds for individual-level change will also be estimated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Data will be derived from published phase II and III EORTC trials that used the QLQ-C30 instrument, covering several cancer sites. We will use individual patient data to estimate MIDs for different cancer sites separately. Focus is on anchor-based methods. Anchors will be selected per disease site from available data. A disease-oriented and methodological panel will provide independent guidance on anchor selection. We aim to construct multiple clinical anchors per QLQ-C30 scale and also to compare with several anchor-based methods. The effects of covariates, for example, gender, age, disease stage and so on, will also be investigated. We will examine how our estimated MIDs compare with previously published guidelines, hence further contributing to robust MID guidelines for the EORTC QLQ-C30.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All patient data originate from completed clinical trials with mandatory written informed consent, approved by local ethical committees. Our findings will be presented at scientific conferences, disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and also compiled in a MID 'blue book' which will be made available online on the EORTC Quality of Life Group website as a free guideline document.

摘要

引言

多年来,癌症临床试验中患者对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的评估有所增加,因此,对组间HRQOL评分差异及组内变化进行有意义的解读的需求也随之增加。确定HRQOL评分中具有最小重要差异(MID)的指标对临床医生、患者和研究人员都很有用,并且可作为评估医疗干预成功与否的基准。我们的目标是提供一个基于证据的方案,以确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30项(EORTC QLQ-C30)的MID。我们将主要关注组间比较的MID估计。还将估计个体水平变化的反应者阈值。

方法与分析

数据将来源于已发表的使用QLQ-C30工具的II期和III期EORTC试验,涵盖多个癌症部位。我们将使用个体患者数据分别估计不同癌症部位的MID。重点是基于锚定的方法。将根据疾病部位从现有数据中选择锚定指标。一个以疾病为导向的方法学小组将为锚定指标的选择提供独立指导。我们的目标是为每个QLQ-C30量表构建多个临床锚定指标,并与几种基于锚定的方法进行比较。还将研究协变量(如性别、年龄、疾病分期等)的影响。我们将研究我们估计的MID与先前发表的指南相比如何,从而进一步为EORTC QLQ-C30的稳健MID指南做出贡献。

伦理与传播

所有患者数据均来自已完成的临床试验,这些试验均获得了当地伦理委员会批准的强制性书面知情同意书。我们的研究结果将在科学会议上展示,通过同行评审出版物传播,并汇编成一本MID“蓝皮书”,该蓝皮书将作为免费指南文件在EORTC生活质量小组网站上在线提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca3/5781104/7a585873de6d/bmjopen-2017-019117f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca3/5781104/7a585873de6d/bmjopen-2017-019117f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca3/5781104/7a585873de6d/bmjopen-2017-019117f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol.基于锚定法确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量测量指标的最小重要差异(MID):一项荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e019117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019117.
2
Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer.解释欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷核心 30 评分在卵巢癌患者中的最小重要差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;159(2):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients.建立基于锚定的 EORTC QLQ-C30 在脑胶质瘤患者中的最小重要差异。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1327-1336. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab037.
4
Minimally important differences for interpreting the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy.在接受化疗的晚期结直肠癌患者中解释 EORTC QLQ-C30 的最小有意义差异。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;22(12):2278-2287. doi: 10.1111/codi.15295. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores as minimally importantly different for patients with malignant melanoma.将欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 评分解释为恶性黑色素瘤患者的最小重要差异。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:169-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Estimating the minimally important difference for the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer.估算癌症患者 EQ-5D-5L 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 的最小重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02294-3.
7
Minimally important differences for interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 change scores over time: A synthesis across 21 clinical trials involving nine different cancer types.最小有意义变化值在解读 EORTC QLQ-C30 时间变化评分中的作用:跨越涉及 9 种不同癌症类型的 21 项临床试验的综合研究
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jul;188:171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 May 7.
8
Minimally important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma - Interpretation guidance derived from two randomized EORTC trials.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30量表在肺癌或恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中的最小重要差异——来自两项EORTC随机试验的解读指南
Lung Cancer. 2022 May;167:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial.EORTC QLQ-C30 在转移性乳腺癌患者中的最小有意义差异:一项随机临床试验的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1829-1836. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03074-y. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials.EORTC QLQ-C30 在前列腺癌临床试验中的最小重要差异。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08609-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A minimal clinically important difference for the sleep inertia visual analog scale in idiopathic hypersomnia.发作性睡病中睡眠惯性视觉模拟量表的最小临床重要差异。 (注:原文标题中的“Idiopathic hypersomnia”应改为“Narcolepsy”才准确,即发作性睡病,这里按照原文翻译)
J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Jul 1;21(7):1209-1216. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11662.
2
Interpretation of Change in Novel Digital Measures: A Statistical Review and Tutorial.新型数字测量变化的解读:统计回顾与教程
Digit Biomark. 2025 Feb 3;9(1):52-66. doi: 10.1159/000543899. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Anchor-based minimal important difference values are often sensitive to the distribution of the change score.

本文引用的文献

1
The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies.最小临床重要差异提高了结局效应的统计学意义,对未来研究具有方法学意义。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
2
23rd Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research.国际生活质量研究学会第23届年会
Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):1-196. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1390-7.
3
Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures-a systematic review.
基于锚定的最小重要差异值通常对变化分数的分布敏感。
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1223-1232. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03610-6. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
Quality of life with encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib treatment in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes from BEACON CRC.伴有或不伴有 binimetinib 治疗的 encorafenib 联合 cetuximab 治疗 BRAF V600E 突变型转移性结直肠癌患者的生活质量:来自 BEACON CRC 的患者报告结局。
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100477. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100477. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
Factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) deterioration in glioma patients during the progression-free survival period.与无进展生存期内胶质瘤患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)恶化相关的因素。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;24(12):2159-2169. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac097.
6
Overview of health-related quality of life and toxicity of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving curative-intent radiotherapy in a real-life setting (the REQUITE study).真实环境下接受根治性放疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的健康相关生活质量和毒性概述(REQUITE 研究)。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:228-241. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
7
Association between skeletal muscle mass and quality of life in adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者骨骼肌质量与生活质量的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Apr;13(2):839-857. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12928. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
8
Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial.EORTC QLQ-C30 在转移性乳腺癌患者中的最小有意义差异:一项随机临床试验的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1829-1836. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03074-y. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials.EORTC QLQ-C30 在前列腺癌临床试验中的最小重要差异。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08609-7.
10
Methodological approach for determining the Minimal Important Difference and Minimal Important Change scores for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-HN43) exemplified by the Swallowing scale.确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈部癌症模块(EORTC QLQ-HN43)吞咽量表的最小重要差异和最小重要变化评分的方法学方法举例说明。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):841-853. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02939-6. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
疲劳患者报告结局测量的最小重要差异——一项系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 26;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0167-6.
4
Using ROC curves to choose minimally important change thresholds when sensitivity and specificity are valued equally: the forgotten lesson of pythagoras. theoretical considerations and an example application of change in health status.当灵敏度和特异度被同等重视时,使用ROC曲线选择最小重要变化阈值:毕达哥拉斯被遗忘的教训。关于健康状况变化的理论思考及一个示例应用
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e114468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114468. eCollection 2014.
5
Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 组变化评分的循证指南。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
6
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods.最小有意义差异(MID)点:术语和方法批判。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Apr;11(2):171-84. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.9.
7
Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods.解读患者报告的结局结果:美国 FDA 指南和新兴方法。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Apr;11(2):163-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.12.
8
Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients.脑癌患者 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC QLQ-BN20 量表的最小临床有意义差异。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2107-2112. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq726. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
9
Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30.基于证据的指南,用于确定样本量和解释欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):89-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.0107. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
10
Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials.解读参与随机对照试验的肺癌患者 EORTC QLQ-C30 健康相关生活质量评分的最小有意义差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Nov;19(11):1753-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1016-5. Epub 2010 Oct 1.