Jeong Kyung In, Choi Ja Yun
Department of Nursing, Daedong College, Busan, Korea.
College of Nursing, Chonnam National University · Chonnam Research Institute of Nursing Science, Gwangju, Korea.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017 Dec;47(6):842-853. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.6.842.
This study was conducted to identify effects of debriefing based on the clinical judgment model for nursing students on their knowledge, skill performance, clinical judgment, self-confidence and learner satisfaction during simulation based end-of-life care (ELC) education.
Simulation based ELC education was developed in six steps as follows: selection of learning subjects and objects, development of learning tools, a trial run of simulation-based education, students' skill training, and evaluators' training. Forty-eight senior nursing students (25 in the experimental group and 23 in the control group) participated in the simulation-based ELC education using a high-fidelity simulator. Debriefing based on the clinical judgment was compared with the usual debriefing.
ANCOVA showed that there were differences in knowledge (F=4.81, p=.034), skill performance (F=68.33, p<.001), clinical judgment (F=18.33, p<.001) and self-confidence (F=4.85, p=.033), but no difference in satisfaction (t=-0.38, p=.704) between the experimental and control groups.
This study found that debriefing based on the clinical judgement model is effective for supporting nursing students for reflecting on clinical judgment and improving their diverse competencies in complex clinical settings such as ELC.
本研究旨在确定基于临床判断模型的汇报对护理专业学生在基于模拟的临终关怀(ELC)教育期间的知识、技能表现、临床判断、自信心和学习者满意度的影响。
基于模拟的ELC教育按以下六个步骤开展:学习主题和对象的选择、学习工具的开发、基于模拟的教育试运行、学生技能培训和评估者培训。48名高年级护理专业学生(实验组25名,对照组23名)使用高保真模拟器参与了基于模拟的ELC教育。将基于临床判断的汇报与常规汇报进行比较。
协方差分析表明,实验组和对照组在知识(F=4.81,p=0.034)、技能表现(F=68.33,p<0.001)、临床判断(F=18.33,p<0.001)和自信心(F=4.85,p=0.033)方面存在差异,但在满意度方面无差异(t=-0.38,p=0.704)。
本研究发现,基于临床判断模型的汇报对于支持护理专业学生反思临床判断以及提高他们在ELC等复杂临床环境中的多种能力是有效的。