Wehrum Thomas, Guenther Felix, Fuchs Alexander, Schuchardt Florian, Hennemuth Anja, Harloff Andreas
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Heart Center, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jun;34(6):939-946. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1298-0. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
4D flow MRI is an emerging technique that allows quantification of 3D blood flow in vivo. However, comparisons with methods of blood velocity quantification used in clinical routine are sparse. Therefore, we compared velocity quantification using 4D flow MRI with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography at the mitral and aortic valves and the aorta. Forty-eight stroke patients (age 67.3 ± 15.0 years) were examined by 4D flow MRI. Blood flow velocities were assessed using standardized 2D analysis planes positioned in the mitral valve (MV), aortic valve (AV), ascending aorta (AAo), and descending aorta (DAo) and were compared with echocardiography. MRI showed moderate-high correlations of systolic velocity values for the MV (r = 0.67, p < 0.001), AV (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), AAo (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), and DAo (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) along with moderate-high intraclass-correlation-coefficients: MV 0.79 (95% CI 0.62, 0.88), AV 0.86 (95% CI 0.75, 0.92), AAo 0.96 (95% CI 0.93, 0.98), and DAo 0.83 (95% CI 0.70, 0.90). However, MRI underestimated absolute systolic blood flow velocities compared with echocardiography by 8.6% for the MV (p = 0.07), 3.1% for the AV (p = 0.48), 10.7% for the AAo (p = 0.09), and 15.0% for the DAo (p = 0.01). Blood flow velocities obtained using 4D flow MRI and echocardiography at the MV, AV, and the ascending and DAo showed moderate to high correlations. Underestimation of absolute velocity values by MRI was low. Thus, 4D flow MRI seems ideally suited to comprehensively assess cardiac and aortic pathologies and related hemodynamic changes in future studies.
四维血流磁共振成像(4D flow MRI)是一种新兴技术,可在体内对三维血流进行定量分析。然而,与临床常规使用的血流速度定量方法的比较却很少。因此,我们将4D flow MRI的速度定量与经胸和经食管超声心动图在二尖瓣、主动脉瓣及主动脉处进行了比较。对48名中风患者(年龄67.3±15.0岁)进行了4D flow MRI检查。使用位于二尖瓣(MV)、主动脉瓣(AV)、升主动脉(AAo)和降主动脉(DAo)的标准化二维分析平面评估血流速度,并与超声心动图进行比较。MRI显示,MV(r = 0.67,p < 0.001)、AV(r = 0.77,p < 0.001)、AAo(r = 0.93,p < 0.001)和DAo(r = 0.76,p < 0.001)的收缩期速度值具有中度至高度相关性,同时具有中度至高度组内相关系数:MV为0.79(95%CI 0.62,0.88),AV为0.86(95%CI 0.75,0.92),AAo为0.96(95%CI 0.93,0.98),DAo为0.83(95%CI 0.70,0.90)。然而,与超声心动图相比,MRI低估了绝对收缩期血流速度,MV低估了8.6%(p = 0.07),AV低估了3.1%(p = 0.48),AAo低估了10.7%(p = 0.09),DAo低估了15.0%(p = 0.01)。在MV、AV以及升主动脉和降主动脉处,使用4D flow MRI和超声心动图获得的血流速度显示出中度至高度相关性。MRI对绝对速度值的低估程度较低。因此,在未来的研究中,4D flow MRI似乎非常适合全面评估心脏和主动脉病变以及相关的血流动力学变化。