Suppr超能文献

联合治疗与运动及矫形支具对足底筋膜炎疼痛的管理效果比较:一项随机对照试验

Combination Therapy Versus Exercise and Orthotic Support in the Management of Pain in Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Cinar Eda, Saxena Shikha, Uygur Fatma

机构信息

1 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

2 Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science Cyprus International University, Cyprus, Turkey.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Apr;39(4):406-414. doi: 10.1177/1071100717747590. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at estimating the effectiveness of two commonly used modalities-extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT)-each combined with usual care (exercises and orthotic supports) in comparison to only usual care to relieve pain in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF).

METHODS

Participants with PF were randomly allocated into 3 groups: ESWT (n = 25), LLLT (n = 24), and control (n = 17). All participants received a home exercise program with orthotic support. The ESWT group received 2000 shock waves with 0.02 mJ/mm for 3 sessions, once a week; LLLT group received gallium-aluminum-arsenide laser with 850 nm wavelength for 10 sessions, 3 times a week. Pain was measured by Foot Function Index-pain subscale (FFI-p) and Numerical Rating Scale for pain (NRS-p). The scores were recorded at baseline, third week, and third month after the treatment. Analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in pain over the 3 months in all groups on both FFI-p ( P < .001) and NRS-p ( P < .001). In NRS-p, LLLT group had significantly lower pain than ESWT ( P = .002) at the third week and control ( P = .043) and ESWT ( P = .003) at third month. In FFI-p total score, ESWT group had higher pain than LLLT ( P = .003) and control ( P = .035) groups at third week and LLLT ( P = .010) group at third month.

CONCLUSION

When LLLT and ESWT were combined with usual care, LLLT was found to be more effective than ESWT in reducing pain in PF at short-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, comparative study.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估两种常用治疗方式——体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)和低强度激光疗法(LLLT),分别联合常规护理(运动和矫形支具)与仅采用常规护理相比,对缓解足底筋膜炎(PF)患者疼痛的效果。

方法

PF患者被随机分为3组:ESWT组(n = 25)、LLLT组(n = 24)和对照组(n = 17)。所有参与者均接受家庭运动计划并使用矫形支具。ESWT组接受2000次冲击波治疗,能量密度为0.02 mJ/mm,共3个疗程,每周1次;LLLT组接受波长为850 nm的砷化镓铝激光治疗,共10个疗程,每周3次。采用足部功能指数疼痛分量表(FFI-p)和疼痛数字评定量表(NRS-p)测量疼痛程度。在治疗前、治疗后第3周和第3个月记录评分。采用重复测量方差分析进行分析。

结果

在3个月的时间里,所有组的FFI-p(P <.001)和NRS-p(P <.001)疼痛评分均有显著改善。在NRS-p评分中,LLLT组在第3周时疼痛程度显著低于ESWT组(P =.002),在第3个月时显著低于对照组(P =.043)和ESWT组(P =.003)。在FFI-p总分方面,ESWT组在第3周时疼痛程度高于LLLT组(P =.003)和对照组(P =.035),在第3个月时高于LLLT组(P =.010)。

结论

当LLLT和ESWT联合常规护理时,发现在短期随访中,LLLT在减轻PF患者疼痛方面比ESWT更有效。

证据水平

II级,比较研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验