Suppr超能文献

评估接受结直肠切除术的癌症患者的监督多模态预康复计划:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of supervised multimodal prehabilitation programme in cancer patients undergoing colorectal resection: a randomized control trial.

机构信息

a Department of Anesthesia , McGill University Health Center , Montreal , Canada.

b School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care , University of Milan , Milan , Italy.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2018 Jun;57(6):849-859. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1423180. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation has been previously shown to be more effective in enhancing postoperative functional capacity than rehabilitation alone. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a weekly supervised exercise session could provide further benefit to our current prehabilition program, when comparing to standard post-surgical rehabilitation.

METHODS

A parallel-arm single-blind randomized control trial was conducted in patients scheduled for non-metastatic colorectal cancer resection. Patients were assigned to either a once weekly supervised prehabilitation (PREHAB+, n = 41) or standard rehabilitation (REHAB, n = 39) program. Both multimodal programs were home-based program and consisted of moderate intensity aerobic and resistance exercise, nutrition counseling with daily whey protein supplementation and anxiety-reduction strategies. Perioperative care was standardized for both groups as per enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines. Functional exercise capacity, as determined by the 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), was the primary outcome. Exercise quantity, intensity and energy expenditure was determined by the CHAMPS questionnaire.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable for baseline walking capacity (PREHAB+: 448 m [IQR 375-525] vs. REHAB: 461 m [419-556], p=.775) and included a similar proportion of patients who improved walking capacity (>20 m) during the preoperative period (PREHAB+: 54% vs. REHAB: 38%, p = .222). After surgery, changes in 6MWD were also similar in both groups. In PREHAB+, however, there was a significant association between physical activity energy expenditure and 6MWD (p < .01). Previously inactive patients were more likely to improve functional capacity due to PREHAB+ (OR 7.07 [95% CI 1.10-45.51]).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a weekly supervised exercise session to our current prehabilitation program did not further enhance postoperative walking capacity when compared to standard REHAB care. Sedentary patients, however, seemed more likely to benefit from PREHAB+. An association was found between energy spent in physical activity and 6MWD. This information is important to consider when designing cost-effective prehabilitation programs.

摘要

背景

与单独康复相比,术前康复在提高术后功能能力方面更有效。本研究旨在确定每周一次的监督锻炼是否可以为我们当前的术前康复计划提供额外的益处,与标准术后康复相比。

方法

对计划接受非转移性结直肠癌切除术的患者进行了一项平行臂单盲随机对照试验。患者被分配到每周一次的监督术前康复(PREHAB+,n=41)或标准康复(REHAB,n=39)组。两个多模式方案均为家庭为基础的方案,包括中等强度的有氧运动和阻力运动、营养咨询以及每日乳清蛋白补充和减轻焦虑的策略。根据术后加速康复(ERAS)指南,为两组提供标准化的围手术期护理。主要结局是 6 分钟步行测试距离(6MWD)确定的功能性运动能力。通过 CHAMPS 问卷确定运动数量、强度和能量消耗。

结果

两组患者的基线步行能力相当(PREHAB+:448m[IQR 375-525] vs. REHAB:461m[419-556],p=0.775),并且在术前期间有相似比例的患者提高了步行能力(>20m)(PREHAB+:54% vs. REHAB:38%,p=0.222)。手术后,两组患者的 6MWD 变化也相似。然而,在 PREHAB+中,体力活动能量消耗与 6MWD 之间存在显著关联(p<0.01)。以前不活跃的患者由于 PREHAB+更有可能提高功能能力(OR 7.07[95%CI 1.10-45.51])。

结论

与标准 REHAB 护理相比,将每周一次的监督锻炼添加到我们当前的术前康复计划中并没有进一步提高术后步行能力。然而,久坐不动的患者似乎更容易从 PREHAB+中受益。发现体力活动所消耗的能量与 6MWD 之间存在关联。在设计具有成本效益的术前康复计划时,这一信息很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验