Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1179-1184. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15123. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
To evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained with cassava flour slurry (CFS) compared with conventional gel in order to determine objectively whether CFS could be a true low-cost alternative.
Blinded non-inferiority trial.
Obstetrical ultrasound unit in an academic medical centre.
Women with a singleton pregnancy, undergoing anatomy ultrasounds.
Thirty pregnant women had standard biometry measures obtained with CFS and conventional gel. Images were compared side-by-side in random order by two blinded sonologists and rated for image resolution, detail and total image quality using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Ratings were compared using paired t-tests. Participant and sonographer experience was measured using five-point Likert scales.
Image resolution, detail, and total image quality. Participant experience of gel regarding irritation, messiness, and ease of removal.
We found no significant difference between perceived image quality obtained with CFS (mean = 6.2, SD = 1.2) and commercial gel (mean = 6.4, SD = 1.2) [t (28) = -1.1; P = 0.3]. Images were not rated significantly differently for either reviewer in any measure, any standardized image or any view of a specific anatomic structure. All five sonographers rated CFS as easy to obtain clear images and easy for patient and machine cleanup. Only one participant reported itching with CFS.
CFS produces comparable image quality to commercial ultrasound gel. The dissemination of these results and the simple CFS recipe could significantly increase access to ultrasound for screening, monitoring and diagnostic purposes in resource-limited settings.
This study was internally funded by our department.
Low-cost homemade cassava flour slurry creates images equal to commercial ultrasound gel, improving access.
评估用木薯粉浆(CFS)获得的超声图像质量,以确定 CFS 是否真的可以作为一种低成本的替代方法。
双盲非劣效性试验。
学术医疗中心的产科超声室。
接受超声检查的单胎妊娠妇女。
30 名孕妇使用 CFS 和常规凝胶进行标准的生物测量。两名盲法超声医生并排随机比较图像,并使用 10cm 视觉模拟评分对图像分辨率、细节和整体图像质量进行评分。使用配对 t 检验比较评分。使用五点 Likert 量表测量参与者和超声医生的经验。
图像分辨率、细节和整体图像质量。参与者对凝胶的刺激、混乱和易于去除的体验。
我们发现使用 CFS(平均 6.2,SD 1.2)和商业凝胶(平均 6.4,SD 1.2)获得的感知图像质量之间没有显著差异[t(28) = -1.1;P = 0.3]。在任何测量、任何标准化图像或任何特定解剖结构的视图中,两位审阅者都没有对图像进行评分差异。所有五位超声医生都认为 CFS 很容易获得清晰的图像,并且易于患者和机器清洁。只有一名参与者报告使用 CFS 时有瘙痒感。
CFS 产生的图像质量与商业超声凝胶相当。传播这些结果和简单的 CFS 配方可以显著增加资源有限地区的筛查、监测和诊断目的的超声使用。
本研究由我们部门内部资助。
低成本的自制木薯粉浆可产生与商业超声凝胶相当的图像,从而改善了获取途径。