• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的贝叶斯基准剂量估计系统。

A Web-Based System for Bayesian Benchmark Dose Estimation.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

National Toxicology Program Division, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Jan 11;126(1):017002. doi: 10.1289/EHP1289.

DOI:10.1289/EHP1289
PMID:29329100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014690/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling is an important step in human health risk assessment and is used as the default approach to identify the point of departure for risk assessment. A probabilistic framework for dose-response assessment has been proposed and advocated by various institutions and organizations; therefore, a reliable tool is needed to provide distributional estimates for BMD and other important quantities in dose-response assessment.

OBJECTIVES

We developed an online system for Bayesian BMD (BBMD) estimation and compared results from this software with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS).

METHODS

The system is built on a Bayesian framework featuring the application of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling for model parameter estimation and BMD calculation, which makes the BBMD system fundamentally different from the currently prevailing BMD software packages. In addition to estimating the traditional BMDs for dichotomous and continuous data, the developed system is also capable of computing model-averaged BMD estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 518 dichotomous and 108 continuous data sets extracted from the U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database (and similar databases) were used as testing data to compare the estimates from the BBMD and BMDS programs. The results suggest that the BBMD system may outperform the BMDS program in a number of aspects, including fewer failed BMD and BMDL calculations and estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

The BBMD system is a useful alternative tool for estimating BMD with additional functionalities for BMD analysis based on most recent research. Most importantly, the BBMD has the potential to incorporate prior information to make dose-response modeling more reliable and can provide distributional estimates for important quantities in dose-response assessment, which greatly facilitates the current trend for probabilistic risk assessment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1289.

摘要

背景

基准剂量 (BMD) 建模是人类健康风险评估的重要步骤,被用作识别风险评估起点的默认方法。各种机构和组织已经提出并倡导了一种剂量反应评估的概率框架;因此,需要一种可靠的工具来提供 BMD 和剂量反应评估中其他重要量的分布估计。

目的

我们开发了一个用于贝叶斯 BMD (BBMD) 估计的在线系统,并将该软件的结果与美国环保署的基准剂量软件 (BMDS) 进行了比较。

方法

该系统建立在一个贝叶斯框架上,该框架的特点是应用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗 (MCMC) 抽样进行模型参数估计和 BMD 计算,这使得 BBMD 系统从根本上不同于当前流行的 BMD 软件包。除了估计二项式和连续数据的传统 BMD 外,开发的系统还能够计算模型平均 BMD 估计值。

结果

共使用了 518 个二项式和 108 个从美国环保署的综合风险信息系统 (IRIS) 数据库 (和类似数据库) 中提取的连续数据集作为测试数据,以比较 BBMD 和 BMDS 程序的估计值。结果表明,BBMD 系统在许多方面可能优于 BMDS 程序,包括更少的 BMD 和 BMDL 计算和估计失败。

结论

BBMD 系统是一种有用的替代工具,用于估计 BMD,并具有基于最新研究的 BMD 分析的附加功能。最重要的是,BBMD 有可能纳入先验信息,使剂量反应建模更加可靠,并能够提供剂量反应评估中重要量的分布估计,这极大地促进了当前概率风险评估的趋势。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1289.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/92f8312a08bc/EHP1289_f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/bcd256cc8292/EHP1289_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/148c122dc99a/EHP1289_f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/6625aa0be1c0/EHP1289_f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/92f8312a08bc/EHP1289_f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/bcd256cc8292/EHP1289_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/148c122dc99a/EHP1289_f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/6625aa0be1c0/EHP1289_f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6014690/92f8312a08bc/EHP1289_f4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Web-Based System for Bayesian Benchmark Dose Estimation.基于网络的贝叶斯基准剂量估计系统。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Jan 11;126(1):017002. doi: 10.1289/EHP1289.
2
A computational system for Bayesian benchmark dose estimation of genomic data in BBMD.贝叶斯基准剂量基因组数据计算系统在 BBMD 中的应用。
Environ Int. 2022 Mar;161:107135. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107135. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.连续数据的模型不确定性与贝叶斯模型平均基准剂量估计
Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):101-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
4
Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1.基准剂量方法简介及美国环保署基准剂量软件(BMDS)版本 2.1.1。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Jul 15;254(2):181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
5
Comparison of the lower limit of benchmark dose confidence interval with no-observed-adverse-effect level by applying four different software for tumorigenicity testing of pesticides in Japan.应用四种不同软件比较日本农药肿瘤发生试验的基准剂量置信区间下限与无观察到不良效应水平。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;133:105201. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105201. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.基准剂量法——现有模型综述及在健康风险评估中的应用建议。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2003;33(5):505-42.
7
Benchmark dose calculation for ordered categorical responses.有序分类反应的基准剂量计算。
Risk Anal. 2014 Aug;34(8):1435-47. doi: 10.1111/risa.12167. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
8
A comparison of three methods for integrating historical information for Bayesian model averaged benchmark dose estimation.三种方法用于贝叶斯模型平均基准剂量估计中整合历史信息的比较。
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;34(2):288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 14.
9
Nonparametric Bayesian methods for benchmark dose estimation.非参数贝叶斯方法在基准剂量估计中的应用。
Risk Anal. 2013 Sep;33(9):1608-19. doi: 10.1111/risa.12004. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
10
Current modeling practice may lead to falsely high benchmark dose estimates.当前的建模实践可能会导致基准剂量估计值出现错误的偏高情况。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;69(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
bmdrc: Python package for quantifying phenotypes from chemical exposures with benchmark dose modeling.BMDrc:用于通过基准剂量模型量化化学暴露表型的Python软件包。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jul 28;21(7):e1013337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013337. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Mechanistic study of pexidartinib-induced toxicity in human hepatic cells.培西达替尼诱导人肝细胞毒性的机制研究。
Chem Biol Interact. 2025 Oct 8;419:111641. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111641. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
3
Oxidative stress biomarkers for assessing the synergistic toxicity of emamectin benzoate and cyantraniliprole on liver function.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.更新:基准剂量法在风险评估中的应用。
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 24;15(1):e04658. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658. eCollection 2017 Jan.
3
Bayesian Quantile Impairment Threshold Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Endpoints.贝叶斯分位数损伤阈值基准剂量估计用于连续终点。
用于评估甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐和氰虫酰胺对肝功能协同毒性的氧化应激生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02429-6.
4
Bayesian benchmark dose modeling analysis and derivation of points of departure for female reproductive toxicity following exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) - effects on reproductive hormones, folliculogenesis and estrous cyclicity.贝叶斯基准剂量建模分析以及邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)暴露后女性生殖毒性的出发点推导——对生殖激素、卵泡发生和发情周期的影响
Toxicol Sci. 2025 Jul 1;206(1):30-45. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaf052.
5
The use of canonical dose-response models for benchmark dose analysis of continuous toxicological data.使用标准剂量反应模型进行连续毒理学数据的基准剂量分析。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2025;55(4):437-461. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2464067. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
6
Selection of the critical effect size alters hazard characterization - a retrospective analysis of key studies used for risk assessments of PFAS.关键效应量的选择会改变危害特征描述——对用于全氟和多氟烷基物质风险评估的关键研究的回顾性分析。
Front Toxicol. 2025 Mar 14;7:1525089. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1525089. eCollection 2025.
7
Biomonitoring-Based Risk Assessment of Pyrethroid Exposure in the U.S. Population: Application of High-Throughput and Physiologically Based Kinetic Models.基于生物监测的美国人群拟除虫菊酯暴露风险评估:高通量和基于生理学的动力学模型的应用
Toxics. 2025 Mar 16;13(3):216. doi: 10.3390/toxics13030216.
8
7-Hydroxycannabidiol and 7-carboxycannabidiol induced cytotoxicity via apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress in human hepatic cells.7-羟基大麻二酚和7-羧基大麻二酚通过诱导人肝细胞凋亡和内质网应激产生细胞毒性。
Arch Toxicol. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04001-7.
9
Analysis of Acute and Short-Term Fluoride Toxicity in Zebrafish Embryo and Sac-Fry Stages Based on Bayesian Model Averaging.基于贝叶斯模型平均法对斑马鱼胚胎和囊胚期急性及短期氟毒性的分析
Toxics. 2024 Dec 11;12(12):902. doi: 10.3390/toxics12120902.
10
Benchmark Dose for Dioxin Based on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Coexposure Statistical Methods and an Optimized Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic Model.基于妊娠期糖尿病,采用共暴露统计方法和优化的生理药代动力学模型确定二噁英的基准剂量。
Environ Health (Wash). 2024 Jun 14;2(9):661-671. doi: 10.1021/envhealth.4c00017. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
Risk Anal. 2017 Nov;37(11):2107-2118. doi: 10.1111/risa.12762. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose-Response Assessment of Human Health Effects.一种用于人类健康效应剂量反应评估的统一概率框架。
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Dec;123(12):1241-54. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409385. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
Standardizing benchmark dose calculations to improve science-based decisions in human health assessments.规范基准剂量计算,以改善人类健康评估中基于科学的决策。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 May;122(5):499-505. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307539. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
6
Shape and steepness of toxicological dose-response relationships of continuous endpoints.连续终点毒理学剂量-反应关系的形态和陡峭度。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 Mar;44(3):270-97. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2013.853726. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
7
Is the assumption of normality or log-normality for continuous response data critical for benchmark dose estimation?对于连续反应数据,假设正态性或对数正态性对于基准剂量估计是否至关重要?
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Nov 1;272(3):767-79. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
8
Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.连续数据的模型不确定性与贝叶斯模型平均基准剂量估计
Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):101-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
9
Potential uncertainty reduction in model-averaged benchmark dose estimates informed by an additional dose study.基于额外剂量研究的模型平均基准剂量估计的潜在不确定性降低。
Risk Anal. 2011 Oct;31(10):1561-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01595.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
10
Properties of model-averaged BMDLs: a study of model averaging in dichotomous response risk estimation.模型平均BMDL的属性:二分类反应风险估计中的模型平均研究
Risk Anal. 2007 Jun;27(3):659-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00920.x.