Rosseels Wouter, Herteleer Michiel, Sermon An, Nijs Stefaan, Hoekstra Harm
Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0903-1. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Over the last decade, the technique of 3D planning has found its way into trauma surgery. The use of this technique in corrective osteotomies for treatment of malunions provides the trauma surgeon with a powerful tool. However, this technique is not entirely straightforward. We aimed to define potential pitfalls of this technique and possible solutions to overcome these shortcomings.
Ten patients with either a uni-, bi- or triplanar malunion of the long bones were included in this study. These patients were divided into three groups: a weight-bearing group and a non-weight-bearing group, the latter was divided into the humerus group and the forearm group, subsequently. 2D correction parameters were defined and compared within every group, as well as the interpretations of 3D visualization.
The weight-bearing group revealed an undercorrection for almost all clinical measurements of the femur and tibia, while there was adequate matching of the osteotomies and of screw entry points in all cases. In the humerus group, coronal correction angles were nearly perfect in all cases, while axial and sagittal correction rates, however, differed substantially. Screw entry points and osteotomies were all at the level as planned. The forearm group showed undercorrection in multiple planes while there were good matching entry points for the screw trajectories.
Four major pitfalls were encountered using the 3D printing technique: (1) careful examination of the planned guide positioning is mandatory, since suboptimal intra-operative guide positioning is most likely the main cause of the incomplete correction; (2) the use of pre-drilled screw holes do not guarantee adequate screw positioning; (3) translation of bone fragments over the osteotomy planes in case of an oblique osteotomy is a potential hazard; (4) the depth of the osteotomy is hard to estimate, potentially leading to extensive cartilage damage.
在过去十年中,三维规划技术已进入创伤外科领域。该技术在治疗畸形愈合的矫正截骨术中的应用为创伤外科医生提供了一个强大的工具。然而,这项技术并非完全简单直接。我们旨在确定该技术的潜在缺陷以及克服这些缺点的可能解决方案。
本研究纳入了10例长骨单平面、双平面或三平面畸形愈合的患者。这些患者被分为三组:负重组和非负重组,后者随后又分为肱骨组和前臂组。定义并比较了每组内的二维矫正参数以及三维可视化的解读。
负重组在股骨和胫骨的几乎所有临床测量中均显示矫正不足,而在所有病例中截骨术和螺钉置入点均匹配良好。在肱骨组中,所有病例的冠状面矫正角度几乎完美,而轴向和矢状面矫正率则有很大差异。螺钉置入点和截骨术均按计划进行。前臂组在多个平面上显示矫正不足,而螺钉轨迹的置入点匹配良好。
使用三维打印技术时遇到了四个主要缺陷:(1)必须仔细检查计划的导向器定位,因为术中导向器定位欠佳很可能是矫正不完全的主要原因;(2)使用预钻孔并不能保证螺钉的正确定位;(3)在斜行截骨时,骨块在截骨平面上的移位是一个潜在风险;(4)截骨深度难以估计,可能导致广泛的软骨损伤。