Tabernée Heijtmeijer Sander J C, Meesters Anne M L, Verdonschot Nico J J, Jutte Paul C, Doornberg Job N, Pijpker Peter A J, Kraeima Joep
3D-Lab, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02684-8.
Currently, no gold standard exists for 3D analysis of virtually planned surgery accuracy postoperatively. The aim of this study was to present a new, validated and standardised methodology for 3D postoperative assessment of surgical accuracy in patients undergoing 3D virtually planned and guided corrective osteotomies.
All patients who underwent 3D planned corrective osteotomy in 2021-2022 at our center with a postoperative CT were included. Postoperative surgical outcome was analysed with a postoperative CT and compared to the preoperative virtual surgical planning to determine achieved accuracy. Validation of the analysis was performed by evaluating the individual assessment of six experienced observers. A postoperative quantification was performed according to the proposed innovative methodology based on rotation axes of a virtual postoperative bone model aligned to the virtual preoperative bone model and virtual surgical planned bone model. To evaluate the intra-observer variability, one observer performed the assessment twice.
Quantification of 13 patients according resulted in measurements with a median range (and its interquartile range) for 3D translation of: 2.43 mm (3.17), for the angle deviations: 3D rotation, 2D coronal, 2D sagittal and 2D axial were: 0.66° (1.66°), 0.74° (0.44°), 0.99° (1.27°), 2.37° (5.00°), respectively. The inter- and intraobserver reliability established with the Intraclass correlation coefficient was for all measurements excellent (> 0.76).
The proposed 3D CT technique provides an significant more accurate and objective method for assessment of surgical outcome of a guided corrective osteotomy. The present proposed novel methodology showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability with clinically acceptable absolute surgical outcome measurements.
目前,对于虚拟计划手术术后准确性的三维分析尚无金标准。本研究的目的是提出一种新的、经过验证且标准化的方法,用于对接受三维虚拟计划和引导式截骨矫正术的患者进行术后手术准确性的三维评估。
纳入2021年至2022年在本中心接受三维计划截骨矫正术且术后进行了CT检查的所有患者。通过术后CT分析术后手术结果,并与术前虚拟手术计划进行比较,以确定实现的准确性。通过评估六位经验丰富的观察者的个体评估来进行分析的验证。根据所提出的创新方法,基于虚拟术后骨模型与虚拟术前骨模型和虚拟手术计划骨模型对齐的旋转轴进行术后量化。为了评估观察者内变异性,一名观察者进行了两次评估。
对13例患者进行量化后,三维平移的测量结果中位数范围(及其四分位间距)为:2.43毫米(3.17),角度偏差方面:三维旋转、二维冠状面、二维矢状面和二维轴向分别为:0.66°(1.66°)、0.74°(0.44°)、0.99°(1.27°)、2.37°(5.00°)。使用组内相关系数确定的观察者间和观察者内可靠性对于所有测量均为优秀(>0.76)。
所提出的三维CT技术为评估引导式截骨矫正术的手术结果提供了一种显著更准确和客观的方法。目前提出的新方法在观察者间和观察者内具有出色的可靠性,且手术结果的绝对测量在临床上可接受。