Suppr超能文献

常规、冷藏和冷冻保存血小板上清液中生物反应调节剂的特性分析

Characterization of biologic response modifiers in the supernatant of conventional, refrigerated, and cryopreserved platelets.

作者信息

Johnson Lacey, Tan Shereen, Jenkins Emily, Wood Ben, Marks Denese C

机构信息

Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service.

Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2018 Apr;58(4):927-937. doi: 10.1111/trf.14475. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alternatives to room temperature storage of platelets (PLTs) are of interest to support blood banking logistics. The aim of this study was to compare the presence of biologic response modifiers (BRMs) in PLT concentrates stored under conventional room temperature conditions with refrigerated or cryopreserved PLTs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A three-arm pool-and-split study was carried out using buffy coat-derived PLTs stored in 30% plasma/70% SSP+. The three matched treatment arms were as follows: room temperature (20-24°C), cold (2-6°C), and cryopreserved (-80°C with DMSO). Liquid-stored PLTs were tested over a 21-day period, while cryopreserved PLTs were tested immediately after thawing and reconstitution in 30% plasma/70% SSP+ and after storage at room temperature.

RESULTS

Coagulation factor activity was comparable between room temperature and cold PLTs, with the exception of protein S, while cryopreserved PLTs had reduced Factor (F)V and FVIII activity. Cold-stored PLTs retained α-granule proteins better than room temperature or cryopreserved PLTs. Cryopreservation resulted in 10-fold higher microparticle generation than cold-stored PLTs, but both groups contained significantly more microparticles than those stored at room temperature. The supernatant from both cold and cryopreserved PLTs initiated faster clot formation and thrombin generation than room temperature PLTs.

CONCLUSION

Cold storage and cryopreservation alter the composition of the soluble fraction of stored PLTs. These differences in coagulation proteins, cytokines, and microparticles likely influence both the hemostatic capacity of the components and the auxiliary functions.

摘要

背景

血小板(PLT)的室温储存替代方案对于支持血库物流很有意义。本研究的目的是比较在传统室温条件下储存的PLT浓缩物与冷藏或冷冻保存的PLT中生物反应调节剂(BRM)的存在情况。

研究设计与方法

采用三臂合并与分割研究,使用储存在30%血浆/70%SSP+中的 Buffy 层来源的PLT。三个匹配的治疗组如下:室温(20 - 24°C)、冷藏(2 - 6°C)和冷冻保存(-80°C 加 DMSO)。液体储存的PLT在21天内进行测试,而冷冻保存的PLT在解冻并重新悬浮于30%血浆/70%SSP+后以及在室温储存后立即进行测试。

结果

除蛋白S外,室温与冷藏PLT的凝血因子活性相当,而冷冻保存的PLT的因子(F)V和FVIII活性降低。冷藏保存的PLT比室温或冷冻保存的PLT更好地保留了α-颗粒蛋白。冷冻保存导致的微粒生成比冷藏保存的PLT高10倍,但两组的微粒含量均显著高于室温储存的PLT。冷藏和冷冻保存的PLT的上清液比室温PLT引发更快的凝块形成和凝血酶生成。

结论

冷藏和冷冻保存会改变储存PLT的可溶部分的组成。凝血蛋白、细胞因子和微粒的这些差异可能会影响成分的止血能力和辅助功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验