• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期减少全院范围的隔离和强制用药:实施开放式政策超过 6 年。

Long-term reduction of seclusion and forced medication on a hospital-wide level: Implementation of an open-door policy over 6 years.

机构信息

Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, 27, Wilhelm Klein-Strasse, 4012 Basel, Switzerland.

Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, 27, Wilhelm Klein-Strasse, 4012 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;48:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.09.008. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.09.008
PMID:29331599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric inpatient treatment is increasingly performed in settings with locked doors. However, locked wards have well-known disadvantages and are ethically problematic. In addition, recent data challenges the hypothesis that locked wards provide improved safety over open-door settings regarding suicide, absconding and aggression. Furthermore, there is evidence that the introduction of an open-door policy may lead to short-term reductions in involuntary measures. The aim of this study was to assess if the introduction of an open-door policy is associated with a long-term reduction of the frequency of seclusion and forced medication.

METHOD

In this 6-year, hospital-wide, longitudinal, observational study, we examined the frequency of seclusion and forced medication in 17,359 inpatient cases admitted to the Department of Adult Psychiatry, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK) Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland. In an approach to enable a less restrictive policy, six previously closed psychiatric wards were permanently opened beginning from August 2011. During this process, a systematic change towards a more patient-centered and recovery-oriented care was applied. Statistical analysis consisted of generalized estimating equations (GEE) models.

RESULTS

In multivariate analyses controlling for potential confounders, the implementation of an open-door policy was associated with a continuous reduction of seclusion (from 8.2 to 3.5%; η=0.82; odds ratio: 0.88) and forced medication (from 2.4 to 1.2%; η=0.70; odds ratio: 0.90).

CONCLUSION

This underlines the potential of the introduction of an open-door policy to attain a long-term reduction in involuntary measures.

摘要

背景

精神科住院治疗越来越多地在设有锁定门的环境中进行。然而,锁定病房有众所周知的缺点,并且在道德上存在问题。此外,最近的数据对锁定病房在自杀、擅自离院和攻击方面提供优于开放式病房的安全性的假设提出了挑战。此外,有证据表明,开放式病房政策的引入可能会导致非自愿措施的短期减少。本研究旨在评估开放式病房政策的引入是否与禁闭和强制药物治疗频率的长期减少相关。

方法

在这项为期 6 年的、全院范围的、纵向、观察性研究中,我们检查了瑞士巴塞尔大学(University of Basel)的成人精神病学系(UPK)收治的 17359 例住院患者的禁闭和强制药物治疗的频率。为了实现更宽松的政策,从 2011 年 8 月开始,六个以前关闭的精神病病房永久开放。在此过程中,系统地向以患者为中心和以康复为导向的护理方式转变。统计分析包括广义估计方程(GEE)模型。

结果

在控制潜在混杂因素的多变量分析中,开放式病房政策的实施与禁闭(从 8.2%降至 3.5%;η=0.82;优势比:0.88)和强制药物治疗(从 2.4%降至 1.2%;η=0.70;优势比:0.90)的持续减少相关。

结论

这强调了引入开放式病房政策以实现非自愿措施长期减少的潜力。

相似文献

1
Long-term reduction of seclusion and forced medication on a hospital-wide level: Implementation of an open-door policy over 6 years.长期减少全院范围的隔离和强制用药:实施开放式政策超过 6 年。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;48:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.09.008. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
Reduction of seclusion on a hospital-wide level: successful implementation of a less restrictive policy.在全院范围内减少隔离措施:成功实施一项限制较少的政策。
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jul;54:94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
3
[Six years of open-door policy at the University Psychiatric Hospital Basel].[巴塞尔大学精神病医院六年的开放政策]
Nervenarzt. 2019 Jul;90(7):705-708. doi: 10.1007/s00115-019-0733-3.
4
Open doors by fair means: Study protocol for a 3-year prospective controlled study with a quasi-experimental design towards (or to implement) an open Ward policy in acute care units.公平手段开启大门:一项为期 3 年的前瞻性对照研究方案,采用准实验设计,旨在(或实施)急性护理病房的开放式病房政策。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 May 14;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2126-3.
5
Reduced Frequency of Cases with Seclusion Is Associated with "Opening the Doors" of a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit.隔离病例数量的减少与精神科重症监护病房的“开门”举措相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 26;9:57. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00057. eCollection 2018.
6
Aggression and violence in psychiatric hospitals with and without open door policies: A 15-year naturalistic observational study.有和没有开放式病房政策的精神病院中的攻击和暴力行为:一项为期 15 年的自然观察研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;95:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards.《智取之门:一项关于开放式病房政策对急性精神科病房影响的准实验对照研究》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08322-6.
8
[Duration of seclusion and exit of the seclusion room, study of the impact of anamnestic and institutional factors].[隔离时长与隔离室出院情况,既往史及机构因素影响的研究]
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.10.005. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
9
Open-door policy versus treatment-as-usual in urban psychiatric inpatient wards: a pragmatic, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial in Norway.开放式病房与常规治疗在城市精神病住院病房中的比较:挪威一项实用、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 May;11(5):330-338. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00039-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
10
A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.横断面前瞻性研究:精神科急性病房的隔离、约束和非自愿药物治疗:患者、工作人员和病房特点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 6;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-89.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Perspectives on Open-Door Policies in Psychiatry: Mixed Methods Study.患者对精神病学开放政策的看法:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e73610. doi: 10.2196/73610.
2
Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint: results of a retrospective analysis.隔离与约束的患病率及危险因素:一项回顾性分析结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07025-6.
3
Relative efficiency of psychiatric clinics in treating cases without coercion and achieving symptom reduction.精神科诊所在无强制手段治疗病例及实现症状减轻方面的相对效率。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;68(1):e76. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10034.
4
Recovery-oriented and trauma-informed care for people with mental disorders to promote human rights and quality of mental health care: a scoping review.以康复为导向且考虑创伤因素的精神障碍患者护理,以促进人权和精神卫生保健质量:一项范围综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06473-4.
5
Ethnic disparities in rapid tranquillisation use and justifications in adult mental health inpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人心理健康住院环境中快速镇静使用及理由的种族差异:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jan 12;28(1):e301399. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301399.
6
Patient-related characteristics or local tradition: what predicts the admission to a locked ward or the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient treatment?患者相关特征或当地传统:在精神科住院治疗中,是什么因素预测患者会被收治到封闭病房或使用强制手段?
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Nov 12. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01936-3.
7
Specialized short term crisis intervention for patients with personality disorder: Effects on coercion and length of stay.专门针对人格障碍患者的短期危机干预:对强制治疗和住院时间的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;70(8):1516-1524. doi: 10.1177/00207640241277161. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
8
The association between the admission to wards with open- vs. closed-door policy and the use of coercive measures.采用开放政策与封闭政策的病房收治情况与强制手段使用之间的关联。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 25;14:1268727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1268727. eCollection 2023.
9
2022: IS IT TIME TO OPEN THE DOORS IN THE ACUTE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALISATION?2022:是否是时候打开急性精神病院的大门?
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2022 Jul;50(4):206-207. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
10
The relationship between psychological characteristics of patients and their utilization of psychiatric inpatient treatment: A cross-sectional study, using machine learning.患者心理特征与精神科住院治疗利用之间的关系:一项使用机器学习的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):e0266352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266352. eCollection 2022.