• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人心理健康住院环境中快速镇静使用及理由的种族差异:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

Ethnic disparities in rapid tranquillisation use and justifications in adult mental health inpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pedersen Martin Locht, Bricca Alessio, Baker John, Schjerning Ole, Munk-Olsen Trine, Gildberg Frederik Alkier

机构信息

Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark

Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jan 12;28(1):e301399. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301399.

DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2024-301399
PMID:39805639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11748781/
Abstract

QUESTION

Evidence on the likelihood of receiving rapid tranquillisation (RT) across ethnic groups is mixed, with some studies suggesting that ethnic minorities are more likely to receive RT than others. We aimed to investigate the association between ethnicity and RT use in adult mental health inpatient settings and to explore explanations for RT use in relation to ethnicity.

STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS

We searched six databases, grey sources, and references from their inception to 15 April 2024. We included studies reporting the association between RT and ethnic groups in adult mental health inpatient settings. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed using odds ratio (OR) to estimate the association. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. We reported narratively any explanations for RT use in relation to ethnicity.

PROSPERO

CRD42024423831.

FINDINGS

Fifteen studies with 38 622 individuals were included, mainly using white or native as the ethnic majority group compared with other ethnic groups. Individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds were significantly more likely to receive RT than those with ethnic majority backgrounds (OR=1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 1.78; moderate certainty), corresponding to a relative risk of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.17 to 1.48).

CONCLUSION

Disparities appear to exist in RT use across ethnic groups in adult mental health inpatient settings, disproportionately affecting ethnic minorities. Further research is required to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this issue.

摘要

问题

关于不同种族群体接受快速镇静(RT)可能性的证据不一,一些研究表明少数族裔比其他族裔更有可能接受RT。我们旨在调查种族与成人心理健康住院环境中RT使用之间的关联,并探讨与种族相关的RT使用原因。

研究选择与分析

我们检索了六个数据库、灰色文献来源以及从其创建到2024年4月15日的参考文献。我们纳入了报告成人心理健康住院环境中RT与种族群体之间关联的研究。使用比值比(OR)进行随机效应模型的荟萃分析以估计关联。采用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)来评估证据的总体确定性。我们以叙述方式报告了与种族相关的RT使用的任何解释。

国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO):CRD42024423831。

研究结果

纳入了15项研究,共38622名个体,主要将白人或原住民作为与其他种族群体相比的种族多数群体。少数族裔背景的个体比种族多数背景的个体接受RT的可能性显著更高(OR = 1.49;95%置信区间(CI):1.25至1.78;中等确定性),相对风险为1.32(95% CI:1.17至1.48)。

结论

在成人心理健康住院环境中,不同种族群体在RT使用方面似乎存在差异,少数族裔受到的影响尤为严重。需要进一步研究以更全面地了解这个问题。

相似文献

1
Ethnic disparities in rapid tranquillisation use and justifications in adult mental health inpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人心理健康住院环境中快速镇静使用及理由的种族差异:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jan 12;28(1):e301399. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301399.
2
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
3
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non-communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities.针对成年少数民族群体,通过有针对性的大众媒体干预措施来促进健康行为,以降低非传染性疾病风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;2(2):CD011683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011683.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
10
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.老年新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative sedation at the end of life: Practical and ethical considerations.临终时的姑息性镇静:实践与伦理考量
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Jun 14;25(4):100338. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100338.

本文引用的文献

1
The Lancet Group's new guidance to authors on reporting race and ethnicity.《柳叶刀》集团关于作者报告种族和族裔情况的新指南。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 1;403(10442):2360-2361. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01081-X.
2
Prevalence and variability of restrictive care practice use (physical restraint, seclusion and chemical restraint) in adult mental health inpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人精神科住院环境中限制护理实践(身体约束、隔离和药物约束)的使用情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Apr;33(4):1256-1281. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17041. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
Observational studies provide insufficient data for a reliable meta-analysis: a call to revise the current guidelines.
观察性研究提供的数据不足以进行可靠的荟萃分析:呼吁修订现行指南。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02435-7.
4
Ethnic disparities in the use of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review.成人精神科住院环境中限制措施使用的种族差异:范围综述。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;58(4):505-522. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02387-8. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
Association of Black Race With Physical and Chemical Restraint Use Among Patients Undergoing Emergency Psychiatric Evaluation.黑种人种族与急诊精神评估患者身体和化学约束使用的关联。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Jul;73(7):730-736. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100474. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals.医学与科学期刊中种族与民族报告的更新指南。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13304.
7
Racism and mental health.种族主义与心理健康。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;20(2):194-195. doi: 10.1002/wps.20845.
8
Risk factors associated with use of coercive practices in adult mental health inpatients: A systematic review.与成人精神科住院患者使用强制性措施相关的风险因素:系统评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;29(2):220-239. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12757. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Length of stay among multi-ethnic psychiatric inpatients in the United Kingdom.英国多民族精神科住院患者的住院时间。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;102:152201. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152201. Epub 2020 Aug 20.