Granville Michelle, Brennan Patrick T, Jacobson Robert E
Miami Neurosurgical Center, University of Miami Hospital.
Pain Management, Larkin Community Hospital.
Cureus. 2017 Nov 9;9(11):e1832. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1832.
Coccygeal pain is a difficult chronic pain problem with mixed response to various treatments. This is a report of a case of coccygeal pain that after failing various conservative and interventional procedures over five years was evaluated with a temporary peripheral sacral fascial lead followed by implantation of bilateral sacral paramedian leads for peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS). This resulted in marked pain control and resumption of full activity. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score improved from eight pre-implant to one after implant and has remained at that level in follow-up. Peripheral nerve field stimulation has been reported for axial chronic back pain, post-laminectomy pain and sacroiliac joint pain either alone or in conjunction with epidural spinal cord stimulation. Both single and parallel leads have been used to provide wider stimulation but differences in location have not been examined. This is the first case report of the use of PNFS for treatment of intractable chronic coccygeal pain. The effectiveness of PNFS was established for this patient by using a prolonged 10-day temporary trial period followed by a 30-day interval without stimulation during which the pain returned to the pre-trial level before proceeding with permanent implantation, it was clear that in this case, PNFS was effective for pain control. Interestingly, the trial and permanent leads were both in the posterior sacral fascia but not in identical positions yet equally effective for pain control. The observation of the effectiveness of different positions may indicate that at least for peripheral field stimulation there may be significant current spread in the fascia. Two and three months after the implant, we examined the effect of different lead settings and the effect of unilateral stimulation compared with bilateral stimulation with and without interlead communication. The patient feedback in this case provides some understanding of the effect of field stimulation with different lead placements. A trial of a deep peripheral fascial lead for sacral and coccygeal field stimulation is a simple option and may be a reasonable approach to consider in the range of treatments for chronic coccygeal pain.
尾骨痛是一个棘手的慢性疼痛问题,对各种治疗的反应不一。本文报告一例尾骨痛病例,该患者在经历了五年的各种保守治疗和介入治疗均失败后,先采用临时骶部外周筋膜电极进行评估,随后植入双侧骶部旁正中电极进行外周神经场刺激(PNFS)。这使得疼痛得到显著控制,并恢复了正常活动。视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分从植入前的8分改善至植入后的1分,且在随访中一直保持在该水平。外周神经场刺激已被报道用于治疗轴向慢性背痛、椎板切除术后疼痛和骶髂关节疼痛,可单独使用或与硬膜外脊髓刺激联合使用。单电极和并行电极均被用于提供更广泛的刺激,但尚未对电极位置的差异进行研究。这是首例使用PNFS治疗顽固性慢性尾骨痛的病例报告。通过为期10天的延长临时试验期确定了PNFS对该患者的有效性,随后在无刺激的30天间隔期内,疼痛恢复到试验前水平,然后再进行永久植入。显然,在该病例中,PNFS对疼痛控制有效。有趣的是,试验电极和永久电极均位于骶部后筋膜,但位置不同,然而对疼痛控制同样有效。对不同位置有效性的观察可能表明,至少对于外周场刺激,筋膜中可能存在显著的电流扩散。植入后两到三个月,我们研究了不同电极设置的效果以及单侧刺激与双侧刺激(有无电极间通信)的效果对比。该病例中的患者反馈为不同电极放置的场刺激效果提供了一些认识。用于骶部和尾骨场刺激的深部外周筋膜电极试验是一种简单的选择,可能是慢性尾骨痛一系列治疗中值得考虑的合理方法。