Suppr超能文献

皮下外周神经刺激联合导间刺激治疗颈轴和腰背疼痛:病例系列及文献回顾。

Subcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation with inter-lead stimulation for axial neck and low back pain: case series and review of the literature.

机构信息

The Pain Center of Arizona, Peoria, Arizona 85381, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):100-6; discussion 106-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00388.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

While pain in the extremities often responds to treatment using spinal cord stimulation (SCS), axial pain is notoriously refractory to SCS. Interest in subcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (SQ PNS) as an alternative to SCS has emerged, but the most appropriate electrode locations and neurostimulator programming techniques are not yet clear.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients evaluated from August 2009 to December 2010 who had undergone trial of SQ PNS with inter-lead stimulation for axial spine pain. Patients proceeding to implant were followed postoperatively with routine clinical visits and a survey form at last follow-up. Ultrasound was used intraoperatively to ensure placement of electrodes at the appropriate depth in patients with larger body mass index. Primary outcome was patient-reported pain relief at last follow-up. Literature review was conducted by searching MEDLINE (1948-present) and through an unstructured review by the authors.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent trial of SQ PNS and six proceeded to permanent implantation. Fifty percent (3/6) of implanted patients preferred neurostimulation programming that included inter-lead stimulation ("cross-talk"). Average duration of postoperative follow-up was 4.5 months (range 2-9 months). Average patient-reported pain relief at last follow-up was 45% (range 20-80%). One patient required re-operation for migration. Patients not proceeding to implant had paresthesia coverage but no analgesia.

CONCLUSION

SQ PNS is a promising therapy for axial neck and back pain based on a small cohort of patients. Ultrasound was useful to assist with electrode placement at the most appropriate depth beneath the skin. While inter-lead stimulation has been preferred by patients in published reports, we did not find it clearly influenced pain relief. Future investigations should include a randomized, controlled study design, as well as defined implantation technique and neurostimulator programming algorithms.

摘要

目的

尽管四肢疼痛通常可以通过脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗得到缓解,但轴向疼痛却以难治性而闻名。人们对皮下周围神经刺激(SQ PNS)作为 SCS 的替代方法产生了兴趣,但最适当的电极位置和神经刺激器编程技术尚不清楚。

方法

对 2009 年 8 月至 2010 年 12 月期间接受 SQ PNS 试验的连续患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者接受了轴向脊柱疼痛的导联间刺激。接受植入的患者在手术后进行常规临床随访,并在最后一次随访时进行问卷调查。对于身体质量指数较大的患者,术中使用超声确保电极放置在适当的深度。主要结果是最后一次随访时患者报告的疼痛缓解情况。通过搜索 MEDLINE(1948 年至今)和作者的非结构化综述进行文献回顾。

结果

10 名患者接受了 SQ PNS 试验,6 名患者进行了永久性植入。植入组中有 50%(3/6)的患者更喜欢包括导联间刺激(“串扰”)的神经刺激编程。术后随访平均时间为 4.5 个月(范围 2-9 个月)。最后一次随访时,患者报告的平均疼痛缓解率为 45%(范围 20-80%)。1 名患者因迁移需要再次手术。未进行植入的患者感觉异常覆盖,但无镇痛作用。

结论

SQ PNS 是一种有前途的治疗颈部和背部轴向疼痛的方法,基于一小部分患者。超声有助于在皮肤下最合适的深度放置电极。虽然导联间刺激在已发表的报告中受到患者的青睐,但我们并没有发现它明显影响疼痛缓解。未来的研究应包括随机对照研究设计,以及定义的植入技术和神经刺激器编程算法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验