1 Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
2 Department of Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Apr;20(2):245-259. doi: 10.1177/1524838017697308. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
The abuse of older women appears to be a significant problem. Developing a better understanding of the extent of the problem is an important step toward preventing it. We conducted a global systematic review and meta-analysis of existing prevalence studies, in multiple languages, that occurred in the community settings from inception to June 26, 2015, in order to determine the extent of abuse against women aged 60 years and over. To disentangle the wide variations in prevalence estimates, we also investigated the associations between prevalence estimates and studies' demographic and methodological characteristics. A total of 50 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The combined prevalence for overall elder abuse in the past year was 14.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) [11.0, 18.0]). Pooled prevalence for psychological abuse was 11.8% (95% CI [9.2%, 14.9%]), neglect was 4.1% (95% CI [2.7%, 6.3%]), financial abuse was 3.8% (95% CI [2.5%, 5.5%]), sexual abuse was 2.2% (95% CI [1.6%, 3.0%]), and physical abuse was 1.9% (95% CI [1.2%, 3.1%]). The studies included in the meta-analysis for overall abuse were heterogeneous indicating that significant differences among the prevalence estimates exist. Significant associations were found between prevalence estimates and the following covariates: World Health Organization-defined regions, countries' income classification, and sample size. Together, these covariates explained 37% of the variance. Although robust prevalence studies are sparse in low- and middle-income countries, about 1 in 6, or 68 million older women experience abuse worldwide. More work is needed to understand the variation in prevalence rates and implications for prevention.
虐待老年妇女似乎是一个严重的问题。更好地了解问题的严重程度是预防虐待的重要一步。我们对现有的社区环境下的流行率研究进行了全球系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些研究使用多种语言,从研究开始到 2015 年 6 月 26 日进行,以确定 60 岁及以上妇女遭受虐待的程度。为了理清流行率估计值的广泛差异,我们还调查了流行率估计值与研究的人口统计学和方法学特征之间的关系。共有 50 项研究纳入荟萃分析。过去一年中总体老年虐待的综合流行率为 14.1%(95%置信区间[11.0%,18.0%])。心理虐待的合并流行率为 11.8%(95%置信区间[9.2%,14.9%]),忽视为 4.1%(95%置信区间[2.7%,6.3%]),经济虐待为 3.8%(95%置信区间[2.5%,5.5%]),性虐待为 2.2%(95%置信区间[1.6%,3.0%]),身体虐待为 1.9%(95%置信区间[1.2%,3.1%])。纳入荟萃分析的总体虐待研究具有异质性,表明流行率估计值存在显著差异。流行率估计值与以下协变量之间存在显著关联:世界卫生组织定义的区域、国家收入分类和样本量。这些协变量共同解释了 37%的变异。尽管在中低收入国家中,关于虐待的可靠流行率研究很少,但全世界约有 1/6,即 6800 万老年妇女遭受虐待。需要进一步研究以了解流行率的差异及其对预防工作的影响。