Taheripanah Robabeh, Vasef Mahshid, Zamaniyan Marzieh, Taheripanah Anahita
Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Infertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;12(1):1-5. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5259. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
The aim of the current study is to compare quinagolide with cabergoline in prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) among high risk women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
This randomized clinical trial study was performed from March 2015 to February 2017. One hundred and twenty six women undergoing ICSI who were at high risk of developing OHSS (having over 20 follicles of >12 mm), were randomized into two groups. The first group received cabergoline 0.5 mg and the second group received quinagolide 75 mg every day for 7 days commencing on the day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration. Then OHSS symptoms as well as their severity were assessed according to standard definition, 3 and 6 days after GnRH agonist administration. Ascites were determined by trans-vaginal ultrasound. Other secondary points were the number of oocytes and the number of embryos and their quality. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using Student's t test, and Chi-square or fisher's exact test, respectively. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The incidence of severe OHSS in the quinagolide-treated group was 3.1% while it was 15.8% in cabergolinetreated subjects (P<0.001). Ascites were less frequent after treatment with Quinagolide as compared to cabergoline (21.9% vs. 61.9%, respectively) (P=0.0001). There was no significant statistical deferences between the two groups in terms of mean age, number of oocytes, metaphase I and metaphase II oocytes, and germinal vesicles. There was a significant difference between cabergoline and quinagolide groups regarding the embryo number (P=0.037) with cabergoline-treated group showing a higher number of embryos. But, the number of good quality embryo in quinagolide- treated individuals was significantly higher than that of the cabergoline-treated group (P=0.001).
Quinagolide seems to be more effective than Cabergoline in prevention of OHSS in high-risk patients undergoing ICSI. (Registration number: IRCT2016053128187N1).
本研究旨在比较喹高利特与卡麦角林在预防接受卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的高危女性卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)方面的效果。
本随机临床试验研究于2015年3月至2017年2月进行。126名接受ICSI且有发生OHSS高风险(有超过20个直径>12mm的卵泡)的女性被随机分为两组。第一组每天服用0.5mg卡麦角林,第二组从促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂给药当天起,每天服用75mg喹高利特,共7天。然后在GnRH激动剂给药后3天和6天,根据标准定义评估OHSS症状及其严重程度。通过经阴道超声确定腹水情况。其他次要指标为卵母细胞数量、胚胎数量及其质量。定量和定性数据分别使用学生t检验以及卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验进行分析。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
喹高利特治疗组严重OHSS的发生率为3.1%,而卡麦角林治疗组为15.8%(P<0.001)。与卡麦角林相比,喹高利特治疗后腹水出现频率更低(分别为21.9%和61.9%)(P=0.0001)。两组在平均年龄、卵母细胞数量、减数分裂I期和减数分裂II期卵母细胞以及生发泡方面无显著统计学差异。卡麦角林组和喹高利特组在胚胎数量方面存在显著差异(P=0.037),卡麦角林治疗组胚胎数量更多。但是,喹高利特治疗个体中优质胚胎的数量显著高于卡麦角林治疗组(P=0.001)。
在预防接受ICSI的高危患者发生OHSS方面,喹高利特似乎比卡麦角林更有效。(注册号:IRCT2016053128187N1)