Supervisor, Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Consultant, Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Implant Dent. 2018 Feb;27(1):74-80. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000709.
This study was designed to compare the biomechanical performance of splinted and nonsplinted short implants, in the posterior mandible, using finite element analysis.
Three-dimensional models of short implants with 2 different diameters (4 × 6 mm or 5 × 6 mm) were scanned, and CATIA (R21) was used to simulate the model of an edentulous lower jaw. Experimental groups were designed as follows: (1) D4L6-splinted (three 4 × 6-mm splinted implants), (2) D4L6-nonsplinted, (3) D5L6-splinted, and (4) D5L6-nonsplinted. A 100 N load was applied, and stress and strain values in surrounding bone were analyzed in specific nodes using ANSYS software (16.1).
The maximum stress values under axial load were found in D5L6-splinted model, and under oblique load, D5L6-nonsplinted model had the maximum stress values. Under axial load, D4L6-splinted model showed maximum strain values, but when oblique load was applied, D4L6-nonsplinted model had the maximum strain values.
Splinting adjacent short implants may provide less bone strain and stress, especially at the presence of lateral forces. Increasing the implant diameter may be effective in strain reduction, but does not seem to reduce the bone stress, regardless of the direction of the load applied.
本研究旨在通过有限元分析比较下颌后牙中带夹板和不带夹板的短种植体的生物力学性能。
对两种不同直径(4×6mm 或 5×6mm)的短种植体进行三维扫描,并使用 CATIA(R21)模拟无牙下颌模型。实验组设计如下:(1)D4L6-带夹板(三个 4×6mm 带夹板种植体),(2)D4L6-不带夹板,(3)D5L6-带夹板,和(4)D5L6-不带夹板。使用 ANSYS 软件(16.1)在特定节点分析周围骨的应力和应变值。
轴向载荷下最大的应力值出现在 D5L6-带夹板模型中,而在斜向载荷下,D5L6-不带夹板模型具有最大的应力值。轴向载荷下,D4L6-带夹板模型显示出最大的应变值,但当施加斜向载荷时,D4L6-不带夹板模型具有最大的应变值。
相邻短种植体带夹板可能会减少骨的应变和应力,尤其是在存在侧向力的情况下。增加种植体直径可能会有效减少应变,但无论施加的载荷方向如何,似乎都不会降低骨的应力。