Toniollo Marcelo Bighetti, Macedo Ana Paula, Rodrigues Renata Cristina, Ribeiro Ricardo Faria, de Mattos Maria G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):372-376. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4696.
The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of splinted or nonsplinted prostheses over short- or regular-length Morse taper implants (5 mm and 11 mm, respectively) in the posterior area of the mandible using finite element analysis.
Three-dimensional geometric models of regular implants (Ø 4 × 11 mm) and short implants (Ø 4 × 5 mm) were placed into a simulated model of the left posterior mandible that included the first premolar tooth; all teeth posterior to this tooth had been removed. The four experimental groups were as follows: regular group SP (three regular implants were rehabilitated with splinted prostheses), regular group NSP (three regular implants were rehabilitated with nonsplinted prostheses), short group SP (three short implants were rehabilitated with splinted prostheses), and short group NSP (three short implants were rehabilitated with nonsplinted prostheses). Oblique forces were simulated in molars (365 N) and premolars (200 N). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the minimum principal stress in bone were performed using ANSYS Workbench software, version 10.0.
The use of splinting in the short group reduced the stress to the bone surrounding the implants and tooth. The use of NSP or SP in the regular group resulted in similar stresses.
The best indication when there are short implants is to use SP. Use of NSP is feasible only when regular implants are present.
本研究旨在通过有限元分析比较在下颌骨后部区域,短长度(分别为5mm)和常规长度(11mm)的莫氏锥度种植体上使用夹板式或非夹板式修复体的生物力学性能。
将常规种植体(直径4×11mm)和短种植体(直径4×5mm)的三维几何模型植入包含第一前磨牙的左侧下颌骨模拟模型中;该牙后方的所有牙齿均已拔除。四个实验组如下:常规组SP(三个常规种植体采用夹板式修复体修复)、常规组NSP(三个常规种植体采用非夹板式修复体修复)、短种植体组SP(三个短种植体采用夹板式修复体修复)和短种植体组NSP(三个短种植体采用非夹板式修复体修复)。在磨牙(365N)和前磨牙(200N)上模拟斜向力。使用ANSYS Workbench 10.0软件对骨内的最小主应力进行定性和定量分析。
短种植体组使用夹板可降低种植体和牙齿周围骨的应力。常规组使用NSP或SP产生的应力相似。
存在短种植体时,最佳选择是使用SP。仅当存在常规种植体时,使用NSP才可行。