Suppr超能文献

使用规则或短莫氏锥度种植体修复各种牙槽嵴时,夹板式和非夹板式假体产生的应力分布的三维有限元分析

A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges with Regular or Short Morse Taper Implants.

作者信息

Toniollo Marcelo Bighetti, Macedo Ana Paula, Rodrigues Renata Cristina, Ribeiro Ricardo Faria, de Mattos Maria G

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):372-376. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4696.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of splinted or nonsplinted prostheses over short- or regular-length Morse taper implants (5 mm and 11 mm, respectively) in the posterior area of the mandible using finite element analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional geometric models of regular implants (Ø 4 × 11 mm) and short implants (Ø 4 × 5 mm) were placed into a simulated model of the left posterior mandible that included the first premolar tooth; all teeth posterior to this tooth had been removed. The four experimental groups were as follows: regular group SP (three regular implants were rehabilitated with splinted prostheses), regular group NSP (three regular implants were rehabilitated with nonsplinted prostheses), short group SP (three short implants were rehabilitated with splinted prostheses), and short group NSP (three short implants were rehabilitated with nonsplinted prostheses). Oblique forces were simulated in molars (365 N) and premolars (200 N). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the minimum principal stress in bone were performed using ANSYS Workbench software, version 10.0.

RESULTS

The use of splinting in the short group reduced the stress to the bone surrounding the implants and tooth. The use of NSP or SP in the regular group resulted in similar stresses.

CONCLUSIONS

The best indication when there are short implants is to use SP. Use of NSP is feasible only when regular implants are present.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过有限元分析比较在下颌骨后部区域,短长度(分别为5mm)和常规长度(11mm)的莫氏锥度种植体上使用夹板式或非夹板式修复体的生物力学性能。

材料与方法

将常规种植体(直径4×11mm)和短种植体(直径4×5mm)的三维几何模型植入包含第一前磨牙的左侧下颌骨模拟模型中;该牙后方的所有牙齿均已拔除。四个实验组如下:常规组SP(三个常规种植体采用夹板式修复体修复)、常规组NSP(三个常规种植体采用非夹板式修复体修复)、短种植体组SP(三个短种植体采用夹板式修复体修复)和短种植体组NSP(三个短种植体采用非夹板式修复体修复)。在磨牙(365N)和前磨牙(200N)上模拟斜向力。使用ANSYS Workbench 10.0软件对骨内的最小主应力进行定性和定量分析。

结果

短种植体组使用夹板可降低种植体和牙齿周围骨的应力。常规组使用NSP或SP产生的应力相似。

结论

存在短种植体时,最佳选择是使用SP。仅当存在常规种植体时,使用NSP才可行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验