Suppr超能文献

低风险发热和中性粒细胞减少的儿科肿瘤患者门诊管理的成本效益及家长和医疗服务提供者满意度的提高

Cost-effectiveness and Improved Parent and Provider Satisfaction With Outpatient Management of Pediatric Oncology Patients, With Low-risk Fever and Neutropenia.

作者信息

Bavle Abhishek, Grimes Amanda, Zhao Sibo, Zinn Daniel, Jackson Andrea, Patel Binita, Porea Timothy, Dutta Ankhi, Russell Heidi, Heczey Andras

机构信息

Jimmy Everest Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.

Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers.

出版信息

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018 Oct;40(7):e415-e420. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001084.

Abstract

On the basis of significant evidence for safety, the international pediatric fever and neutropenia committee recommends the identification and management of patients with "low-risk fever and neutropenia" (LRFN), outpatient with oral antibiotics, instead of traditional inpatient management. The aim of our study was to compare the cost-per-patient with these 2 strategies, and to evaluate parent and provider satisfaction with the outpatient management of LRFN. Between March 2016 and February 2017, 17 LRFN patients (median absolute neutrophil count, 90/μL) were managed at a single institution, per new guidelines. Fifteen patients were discharged on presentation or at 24 to 48 hours postadmission on oral levofloxacin, and 2 were inadvertently admitted off protocol. The mean cost of management for the postimplementation cohort was compared with a historic preimplementation control group. Satisfaction surveys were completed by parents and health care providers of LRFN patients. The mean total cost of an LRFN episode was $12,500 per patient preimplementation and $6168 postimplementation, a decrease of $6332 (51%) per patient. All parents surveyed found outpatient follow-up easy; most (12/14) parents and all (16/16) providers preferred outpatient management. Outpatient management of LRFN patients was less costly, and was preferred by a majority of parents and all health care providers, compared with traditional inpatient management.

摘要

基于充分的安全性证据,国际儿科发热与中性粒细胞减少症委员会建议识别和管理“低风险发热与中性粒细胞减少症”(LRFN)患者,采用口服抗生素门诊治疗,而非传统的住院治疗。我们研究的目的是比较这两种策略的人均成本,并评估家长和医疗服务提供者对LRFN门诊治疗的满意度。在2016年3月至2017年2月期间,按照新指南,一家机构对17例LRFN患者(中位绝对中性粒细胞计数为90/μL)进行了治疗。15例患者在就诊时或入院后24至48小时口服左氧氟沙星后出院,2例无意中未按方案收治。将实施后队列的平均管理成本与历史实施前对照组进行比较。对LRFN患者的家长和医疗服务提供者进行了满意度调查。LRFN发作的人均总费用在实施前为每名患者12,500美元,实施后为6168美元,每名患者减少了6332美元(51%)。所有接受调查的家长都觉得门诊随访很轻松;大多数(12/14)家长和所有(16/16)医疗服务提供者更喜欢门诊治疗。与传统住院治疗相比,LRFN患者的门诊治疗成本更低,且受到大多数家长和所有医疗服务提供者的青睐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验