Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):944-950. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002668.
The aim of this study was to improve the 8th edition (8th) of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
The new 8th AJCC staging system for PDAC was released in October, 2016, and will be applied in clinical practice in 2018.
Two large cohorts were included in this analysis. One consisted of 45,856 PDAC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2014), and the other consisted of 3166 PDAC patients in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) database (2005-2015).
Using the 8th AJCC staging system, the median overall survival of the patients in the same stage varied widely among the different substages. We proposed a modified staging system based on median OS in which we maintained the T, N, and M definitions, but regrouped the substages. In the SEER cohort, the concordance index was higher for local disease with the modified staging system [0.637; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.631-0.642] than with the 8th AJCC staging system (0.620, 95% CI 0.615-0.626). Similar findings were also observed in the FUSCC cohort. In addition, we verified the reliability of the modified staging system in an analysis of patients with different examined lymph node counts (≥15 or 1-14).
The modified 8th AJCC staging system for PDAC proposed in this study provides improvements and may be evaluated for potential adoption in the next edition.
本研究旨在改进第八版(8 版)美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胰腺癌(PDAC)分期系统。
新的 8 版 AJCC PDAC 分期系统于 2016 年 10 月发布,将于 2018 年在临床实践中应用。
本分析纳入了两个大型队列。一个队列由 SEER 数据库中的 45856 例 PDAC 患者组成(2004-2014 年),另一个队列由复旦大学上海癌症中心(FUSCC)数据库中的 3166 例 PDAC 患者组成(2005-2015 年)。
使用 8 版 AJCC 分期系统,同一分期患者的中位总生存期在不同亚分期之间差异很大。我们提出了一种基于中位 OS 的改良分期系统,该系统保留了 T、N 和 M 的定义,但对亚分期进行了重新分组。在 SEER 队列中,改良分期系统用于局部疾病的一致性指数更高[0.637;95%置信区间(CI)0.631-0.642],高于 8 版 AJCC 分期系统(0.620,95%CI 0.615-0.626)。在 FUSCC 队列中也观察到了类似的发现。此外,我们还在对不同检查淋巴结计数(≥15 或 1-14)的患者进行分析时验证了改良分期系统的可靠性。
本研究提出的改良 8 版 AJCC PDAC 分期系统有所改进,可能在下一版中进行评估。