Suppr超能文献

卫生公平性监测与医疗质量保障。

Health equity monitoring for healthcare quality assurance.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, England, United Kingdom.

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;198:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

Abstract

Population-wide health equity monitoring remains isolated from mainstream healthcare quality assurance. As a result, healthcare organizations remain ill-informed about the health equity impacts of their decisions - despite becoming increasingly well-informed about quality of care for the average patient. We present a new and improved analytical approach to integrating health equity into mainstream healthcare quality assurance, illustrate how this approach has been applied in the English National Health Service, and discuss how it could be applied in other countries. We illustrate the approach using a key quality indicator that is widely used to assess how well healthcare is co-ordinated between primary, community and acute settings: emergency inpatient hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions ("potentially avoidable emergency admissions", for short). Whole-population data for 2015 on potentially avoidable emergency admissions in England were linked with neighborhood deprivation indices. Inequality within the populations served by 209 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs: care purchasing organizations with mean population 272,000) was compared against two benchmarks - national inequality and inequality within ten similar populations - using neighborhood-level models to simulate the gap in indirectly standardized admissions between most and least deprived neighborhoods. The modelled inequality gap for England was 927 potentially avoidable emergency admissions per 100,000 people, implying 263,894 excess hospitalizations associated with inequality. Against this national benchmark, 17% of CCGs had significantly worse-than-benchmark equity, and 23% significantly better. The corresponding figures were 11% and 12% respectively against the similar populations benchmark. Deprivation-related inequality in potentially avoidable emergency admissions varies substantially between English CCGs serving similar populations, beyond expected statistical variation. Administrative data on inequality in healthcare quality within similar populations served by different healthcare organizations can provide useful information for healthcare quality assurance.

摘要

人群健康公平监测仍然与主流医疗保健质量保证相分离。结果,医疗机构对其决策对健康公平的影响仍然知之甚少——尽管他们对普通患者的护理质量越来越了解。我们提出了一种将健康公平纳入主流医疗保健质量保证的新的改进分析方法,说明了该方法在英国国民保健制度中的应用,并讨论了如何在其他国家应用。我们使用一个广泛用于评估初级、社区和急性环境之间医疗协调情况的关键质量指标来说明该方法:用于门诊护理敏感慢性病的急诊住院治疗(简称“可避免急诊入院”)。2015 年英格兰全民数据与社区贫困指数相关联。209 个临床委托组(CCG:护理采购组织,平均人口 272000 人)服务人群的不平等情况与两个基准进行了比较——国家不平等和十个类似人群内的不平等——使用邻里层面的模型来模拟最贫困和最富裕邻里之间间接标准化入院率的差距。英格兰的模拟不平等差距为每 10 万人有 927 例可避免急诊入院,这意味着与不平等相关的额外住院人数为 263894 人。与这一全国基准相比,17%的 CCG 的公平状况明显差于基准,23%的 CCG 则明显好于基准。而与类似人群基准相比,相应的比例分别为 11%和 12%。在为类似人群服务的不同医疗保健组织中,可避免急诊入院的与贫困相关的不平等在英格兰 CCG 之间存在显著差异,超出了预期的统计差异。不同医疗保健组织为类似人群提供的医疗质量不平等的行政数据可以为医疗质量保证提供有用的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验