Suppr超能文献

某些地区比其他地区更平等吗?英格兰地方当局辖区内潜在可避免的急诊住院中的社会经济不平等。

Are some areas more equal than others? Socioeconomic inequality in potentially avoidable emergency hospital admissions within English local authority areas.

作者信息

Sheringham Jessica, Asaria Miqdad, Barratt Helen, Raine Rosalind, Cookson Richard

机构信息

1 Senior Research Associate, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK.

2 Research Fellow, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Apr;22(2):83-90. doi: 10.1177/1355819616679198. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Abstract

Objectives Reducing health inequalities is an explicit goal of England's health system. Our aim was to compare the performance of English local administrative areas in reducing socioeconomic inequality in emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions. Methods We used local authority area as a stable proxy for health and long-term care administrative geography between 2004/5 and 2011/12. We linked inpatient hospital activity, deprivation, primary care, and population data to small area neighbourhoods (typical population 1500) within administrative areas (typical population 250,000). We measured absolute inequality gradients nationally and within each administrative area using neighbourhood-level linear models of the relationship between national deprivation and age-sex-adjusted emergency admission rates. We assessed local equity performance by comparing local inequality against national inequality to identify areas significantly more or less equal than expected; evaluated stability over time; and identified where equity performance was steadily improving or worsening. We then examined associations between change in socioeconomic inequalities and change in within-area deprivation (gentrification). Finally, we used administrative area-level random and fixed effects models to examine the contribution of primary care to inequalities in admissions. Results Data on 316 administrative areas were included in the analysis. Local inequalities were fairly stable between consecutive years, but 32 areas (10%) showed steadily improving or worsening equity. In the 21 improving areas, the gap between most and least deprived fell by 3.9 admissions per 1000 (six times the fall nationally) between 2004/5 and 2011/12, while in the 11 areas worsening, the gap widened by 2.4. There was no indication that measured improvements in local equity were an artefact of gentrification or that changes in primary care supply or quality contributed to changes in inequality. Conclusions Local equity performance in reducing inequality in emergency admissions varies both geographically and over time. Identifying this variation could provide insights into which local delivery strategies are most effective in reducing such inequalities.

摘要

目标 减少健康不平等是英格兰卫生系统的一项明确目标。我们的目的是比较英格兰各地方行政区在减少非卧床护理敏感型慢性病急诊入院方面社会经济不平等的表现。方法 我们将地方当局辖区作为2004/05年至2011/12年期间卫生和长期护理行政地理区域的稳定替代。我们将住院医院活动、贫困程度、初级保健和人口数据与行政区内的小区域社区(典型人口1500人)相联系(典型人口25万)。我们使用国家贫困与年龄性别调整后的急诊入院率之间关系的社区层面线性模型,在全国范围内以及每个行政区内测量绝对不平等梯度。我们通过将地方不平等与国家不平等进行比较,以确定比预期明显更平等或更不平等的地区,来评估地方公平表现;评估随时间的稳定性;并确定公平表现是在稳步改善还是恶化。然后,我们研究了社会经济不平等的变化与区域内贫困变化(中产阶级化)之间的关联。最后,我们使用行政区层面的随机和固定效应模型来研究初级保健对入院不平等的影响。结果 分析纳入了316个行政区的数据。连续几年间地方不平等相当稳定,但有32个地区(10%)显示公平状况在稳步改善或恶化。在21个改善的地区,2004/05年至2011/12年间,最贫困和最不贫困地区之间的差距每1000人减少了3.9例入院(是全国降幅的六倍),而在11个恶化的地区,差距扩大了2.4例。没有迹象表明所衡量的地方公平改善是中产阶级化的假象,也没有表明初级保健供应或质量的变化导致了不平等的变化。结论 地方在减少急诊入院不平等方面的公平表现存在地理差异和时间差异。识别这种差异可以深入了解哪些地方实施策略在减少此类不平等方面最有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e11/5347357/bc42edaa65c2/10.1177_1355819616679198-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验