Suppr超能文献

机器人腹股沟疝修补术

Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

作者信息

Edelman David S

出版信息

Am Surg. 2017 Dec 1;83(12):1418-1421.

Abstract

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has certain advantages over open repair including less pain and earlier return to normal activity. Concurrent robotic inguinal hernia repair at the time of prostatectomy has been shown to have a lower recurrence rate than open repair. Robotic surgery adds high definition visualization and articulating instruments which enhances dexterity that makes laparoscopic hernia repair more refined. A series of robotic, laparoscopic, inguinal hernia repairs by a single surgeon with an extensive laparoscopic hernia experience at a single institution was undertaken to determine the role of robotic laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in minimally invasive surgery. Five hundred forty-two laparoscopic inguinal hernia operations were performed from April 2012 through December 2015. There were 154 cases of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal procedures done during that time. Hospital records and follow-up care were prospectively reviewed and data collected for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesia class, and operative time. Follow-up was done at 2, 8, and 16 weeks after surgery. All patients consented for the study. Ninety percent of the patients were male. Age averaged 57.04 years with a range of 21 to 85 years. American Society of Anesthesia averaged 2.01 with comorbidities of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease being the most common. Body mass index was between 19 and 31.6, averaging 24.34. Twenty-five patients (16%) had an umbilical hernia repair done concomitantly. Operating room time ranged from 25 to 140 minutes with an average of 63.6 minutes decreased as experience increased. One patient with a large, left scrotal hernia was converted to open; one patient developed perforated sigmoid diverticulitis seven days postop and case #5 recurred indirectly after a direct hernia repair. Four patients required prolonged postoperative Foley catheterization. Robotic inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective. Operating room time was longer than standard laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but decreased with experience. A single-port platform may have use in patients with umbilical hernias, 16 per cent, and will need to be studied.

摘要

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术相较于开放修补术具有某些优势,包括疼痛更少以及能更早恢复正常活动。前列腺切除术时同期进行机器人腹股沟疝修补术已被证明其复发率低于开放修补术。机器人手术增加了高清视野和可弯曲器械,提高了灵活性,使腹腔镜疝修补术更加精细。为确定机器人腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术在微创手术中的作用,一位在单一机构拥有丰富腹腔镜疝修补经验的外科医生进行了一系列机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补手术。2012年4月至2015年12月期间共进行了542例腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术。在此期间进行了154例机器人经腹腹膜前手术。对医院记录和后续护理进行了前瞻性审查,并收集了年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会分级和手术时间等数据。术后2周、8周和16周进行随访。所有患者均同意参与该研究。90%的患者为男性。平均年龄57.04岁,范围为21至85岁。美国麻醉医师协会平均分级为2.01,最常见的合并症为高血压、高胆固醇血症和胃食管反流病。体重指数在19至31.6之间,平均为24.34。25例患者(16%)同时进行了脐疝修补术。手术室时间从25分钟至140分钟不等,随着经验增加平均为63.6分钟。1例左侧阴囊大疝患者转为开放手术;1例患者术后7天发生乙状结肠憩室穿孔;病例5在直接疝修补术后间接复发。4例患者术后需要延长留置导尿管时间。机器人腹股沟疝修补术安全有效。手术室时间比标准腹腔镜疝修补术长,但随着经验增加而减少。单孔平台可能对16%的脐疝患者有用,需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验